How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Conditional expectation yields a deterministic half-approximation for Max-Cut
Statement
For every finite simple graph, there is a deterministic polynomial-time algorithm returning a cut of at least edges, hence at least half of . It fixes vertices one at a time to the side with the larger conditional expected final cut size.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite simple graph with , a fixed ordering of its vertices, and the product probability space of independent fair bits , one per vertex.
Placing each vertex independently and uniformly in one of two sides gives the cut number with , and every placement crosses at most edges, so ; for both values are zero. (A random cut crosses half the edges in expectation)
For the maximization problem Max-Cut the objective is the number of crossing edges, the optimum is a maximum over the finitely many placements and is attained, and a polynomial-time -approximation returns a feasible cut of value at least in the value-inequality sense. (Optimization problems and approximation ratios)
Expectation is linear on every finite family of real random variables, with no independence hypothesis. (Expectation is linear for every finite family of random variables, without any independence hypothesis)
Every edge of a finite simple graph is a two-element subset of distinct vertices. (A finite simple graph is a finite vertex set together with a set of two-element vertex subsets)
Proof
Let be the number of crossing edges, where is the indicator that the endpoints of lie on different sides. For a partial assignment of the first bits, define the conditional expectation as the average of over the equally weighted completions. The closed form is , where counts the edges whose two endpoints are among the fixed vertices and which cross under , and counts the edges with at least one unfixed endpoint: a fully fixed edge contributes its crossing indicator, an edge with exactly one fixed endpoint crosses for exactly one of the two equally likely values of the free bit, an edge with two unfixed endpoints crosses for exactly two of the four equally likely pairs of free bits, and [F3] sums these contributions, the edges being finitely many.
For any and any , the completions of split into those with and those with , two equally weighted families of equal size, so . Hence at least one of the two one-bit extensions has conditional expectation at least , and the maximizer is at least the current value.
Define the algorithm: start with the empty assignment ; for compute the two numbers and from the closed form of step 1.1, each a sum over the edges, and extend by if and by otherwise; return the resulting cut. By step 2.1 the conditional expectation does not decrease at any choice, so the nondecreasing sequence ends at the actual cut size of the returned placement, giving .
The algorithm is deterministic after the fixed tie rule and the fixed vertex order, and it runs in polynomial time: rounds with two closed-form evaluations of exact rational operations each, all comparisons of rationals with polynomially bounded bit lengths. By step 3.1 and [F1], the returned feasible cut satisfies ; when both values are zero. By [F2] this is a deterministic polynomial-time -approximation for Max-Cut.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Williamson and Shmoys, The Design of Approximation Algorithms, §5.2 conditional-expectation argument, printed pp. 108–109 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Cornell CS 4820, Lecture notes on randomized approximation algorithms, §1.1.2 Algorithms 1–2, PDF pp. 2–3 (standard reference, not scraped)