Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-28
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

f:ARf : A \to \mathbb{R} is continuous at cAc \in A if and only if ωf(c)=0\omega_f(c) = 0

Statement

Let ARA \subseteq \mathbb{R}, let f:ARf : A \to \mathbb{R} and let cAc \in A. Then

f is continuous at cωf(c)=0f \text{ is continuous at } c \quad \Longleftrightarrow \quad \omega_f(c) = 0

(Continuity of f:ARf : A \to \mathbb{R} at a point of AA and on AA: the ε\varepsilon-δ\delta condition, its agreement with limxcf(x)=f(c)\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = f(c) at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point, The oscillation ωf(S)=sup{f(x)f(y):x,yS}\omega_f(S) = \sup\{\,|f(x) - f(y)| : x, y \in S\,\} of ff on a set and the oscillation ωf(c)=infδ>0ωf(ANδ(c))\omega_f(c) = \inf_{\delta > 0} \omega_f(A \cap N_\delta(c)) at a point, both taken in the extended reals).

Since ωf(c)0\omega_f(c) \ge 0 always (The oscillation ωf(S)=sup{f(x)f(y):x,yS}\omega_f(S) = \sup\{\,|f(x) - f(y)| : x, y \in S\,\} of ff on a set and the oscillation ωf(c)=infδ>0ωf(ANδ(c))\omega_f(c) = \inf_{\delta > 0} \omega_f(A \cap N_\delta(c)) at a point, both taken in the extended reals), the equivalent form of the right-hand side is: for every real ε>0\varepsilon > 0 there is a real δ>0\delta > 0 with ωf(ANδ(c))<ε\omega_f(A \cap N_\delta(c)) < \varepsilon.

This is the tool that converts a pointwise condition into a set condition. Continuity at cc is a statement about ff near cc with a quantifier over ε\varepsilon; ωf(c)=0\omega_f(c) = 0 is the vanishing of a single extended real attached to the point. The change of form is what makes the discontinuity set accessible: the sets {x:ωf(x)ε}\{\,x : \omega_f(x) \ge \varepsilon\,\} are closed (For every real ε>0\varepsilon > 0 the set {xA:ωf(x)ε}\{\,x \in A : \omega_f(x) \ge \varepsilon\,\} is the intersection with AA of a closed subset of R\mathbb{R}; in particular it is closed in R\mathbb{R} when A=RA = \mathbb{R}) and their union over ε=1,1/2,1/3,\varepsilon = 1, 1/2, 1/3, \dots is the discontinuity set (For f:ARf : A \to \mathbb{R} the set of points of AA at which ff is discontinuous is the intersection with AA of an FσF_\sigma subset of R\mathbb{R}, and the set of points at which ff is continuous is the intersection with AA of a GδG_\delta subset; for A=RA = \mathbb{R} the two sets are FσF_\sigma and GδG_\delta outright).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ARA \subseteq \mathbb{R}, a function f:ARf : A \to \mathbb{R}, and a point cAc \in A.

[L1]

ff is continuous at cc exactly when for every real ε>0\varepsilon > 0 there is a real δ>0\delta > 0 with f(x)f(c)<ε|f(x) - f(c)| < \varepsilon for every xAx \in A with xc<δ|x - c| < \delta; equivalently for every xANδ(c)x \in A \cap N_\delta(c) (Continuity of f:ARf : A \to \mathbb{R} at a point of AA and on AA: the ε\varepsilon-δ\delta condition, its agreement with limxcf(x)=f(c)\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = f(c) at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point, The ε\varepsilon-neighbourhood and the punctured ε\varepsilon-neighbourhood of a point of R\mathbb{R}).

[L2]

ωf(S)=sup{f(x)f(y):x,yS}\omega_f(S) = \sup\{|f(x) - f(y)| : x, y \in S\} and ωf(c)=inf{ωf(ANδ(c)):δ>0}\omega_f(c) = \inf\{\omega_f(A \cap N_\delta(c)) : \delta > 0\}, both in R\overline{\mathbb{R}}; 0ωf(c)ωf(ANδ(c))0 \le \omega_f(c) \le \omega_f(A \cap N_\delta(c)) for every real δ>0\delta > 0, and cANδ(c)c \in A \cap N_\delta(c) (The oscillation ωf(S)=sup{f(x)f(y):x,yS}\omega_f(S) = \sup\{\,|f(x) - f(y)| : x, y \in S\,\} of ff on a set and the oscillation ωf(c)=infδ>0ωf(ANδ(c))\omega_f(c) = \inf_{\delta > 0} \omega_f(A \cap N_\delta(c)) at a point, both taken in the extended reals, The extended real line R=R{,+}\overline{\mathbb{R}} = \mathbb{R} \cup \{-\infty, +\infty\}, its order, and the arithmetic that is left undefined).

[L3]

In R\overline{\mathbb{R}} every subset has a least upper bound and a greatest lower bound; a supremum is at most an extended real uu exactly when uu bounds every member of the set, and an infimum is at least an extended real \ell exactly when \ell bounds every member from below (Every subset of R\overline{\mathbb{R}} has a least upper bound and a greatest lower bound in R\overline{\mathbb{R}}, agreeing with the real supremum and infimum on nonempty sets bounded in R\mathbb{R}).

[L4]

uwuv+vw|u - w| \le |u - v| + |v - w| and u0|u| \ge 0 for reals u,v,wu, v, w (Basic properties of the absolute value).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Suppose ff is continuous at cc and let ε>0\varepsilon > 0 be real. Take δ>0\delta > 0 with f(x)f(c)<ε/2|f(x) - f(c)| < \varepsilon/2 for every xANδ(c)x \in A \cap N_\delta(c).

L1
1.2

Conversely, suppose ωf(c)=0\omega_f(c) = 0 and let ε>0\varepsilon > 0 be real. Not every member of {ωf(ANδ(c)):δ>0}\{\omega_f(A \cap N_\delta(c)) : \delta > 0\} can be ε\ge \varepsilon, for then ε\varepsilon would be a lower bound of that set and the infimum ωf(c)=0\omega_f(c) = 0 would satisfy 0ε0 \ge \varepsilon. So there is a real δ>0\delta > 0 with ωf(ANδ(c))<ε\omega_f(A \cap N_\delta(c)) < \varepsilon.

L2L3
2.1

For x,yANδ(c)x, y \in A \cap N_\delta(c) with δ\delta as in step 1.1, f(x)f(y)f(x)f(c)+f(c)f(y)<ε/2+ε/2=ε|f(x) - f(y)| \le |f(x) - f(c)| + |f(c) - f(y)| < \varepsilon/2 + \varepsilon/2 = \varepsilon; so ε\varepsilon is an upper bound of the set whose supremum is ωf(ANδ(c))\omega_f(A \cap N_\delta(c)), and therefore ωf(ANδ(c))ε\omega_f(A \cap N_\delta(c)) \le \varepsilon.

step 1.1L2L3L4
2.2

With δ\delta as in step 1.2 and any xANδ(c)x \in A \cap N_\delta(c): both xx and cc lie in ANδ(c)A \cap N_\delta(c), so f(x)f(c)|f(x) - f(c)| is one of the values whose supremum is ωf(ANδ(c))\omega_f(A \cap N_\delta(c)) and therefore f(x)f(c)ωf(ANδ(c))<ε|f(x) - f(c)| \le \omega_f(A \cap N_\delta(c)) < \varepsilon.

step 1.2L2L3
3.1

Hence 0ωf(c)ε0 \le \omega_f(c) \le \varepsilon for every real ε>0\varepsilon > 0. If ωf(c)\omega_f(c) were not 00 it would satisfy 0<ωf(c)10 < \omega_f(c) \le 1, hence be a positive real, and taking ε:=ωf(c)/2\varepsilon := \omega_f(c)/2 would give ωf(c)ωf(c)/2\omega_f(c) \le \omega_f(c)/2, which is false for a positive real. So ωf(c)=0\omega_f(c) = 0.

step 2.1L2L3
4.1

Since ε>0\varepsilon > 0 was arbitrary in step 1.2, the continuity condition holds at cc, and ff is continuous at cc. Together with step 3.1 this proves the equivalence.

step 3.1step 2.2L1

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 41 results over 12 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources