How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A conjugacy class of size coprime to forces either or scalar action
Statement
Let be a finite group, let be an irreducible complex representation of with character , and let . If the size of the conjugacy class of is coprime to , then either or acts as a scalar on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite group , an irreducible complex representation of with character , and an element .
Central-character values are algebraic integers (The values of a central character are algebraic integers).
An algebraic-integer average of roots of unity is either or constant (An algebraic-integer average of roots of unity is either or a common root of unity).
The character value is the sum of the eigenvalues of , which are roots of unity, and equality in the modulus bound means scalar action (For a complex character, , is a class function, and with equality exactly at scalars).
For the conjugacy class of , the central character satisfies (The central character of an irreducible complex character).
Proof
Let and . By [F4], for the class sum of , so [F1] makes an algebraic integer. Since , choose integers with . Then is an algebraic integer because [F3] shows that is an algebraic integer.
Let be the eigenvalues of . By [F3], they are roots of unity and . Applying [F2] to this average and step 1.1 gives either or .
If , then the diagonalizable operator from [F3] is that common root of unity times the identity, so acts as a scalar on .
Steps 2.1 and 3.1 prove the stated dichotomy.
Depends on
- The central character of an irreducible complex character
- An algebraic-integer average of roots of unity is either $0$ or a common root of unity
- For a complex character, $\chi(1)=\dim V$, $\chi$ is a class function, and $|\chi(g)|\le\chi(1)$ with equality exactly at scalars
- The values of a central character are algebraic integers
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Pavel Etingof et al., Introduction to Representation Theory, Theorem 4.21 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Anupam Singh, Representation Theory of Finite Groups, Lemma 16.2 (standard reference, not scraped)