How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Termination and soundness of the corrected stationary residual certificate
Statement
For every exact rational input in the domain of Correct and certify a finite-chain stationary candidate, the procedure terminates with one of its specified statuses. If it returns certified with corrected candidate , correction distance , residual , and , then P has a unique stationary probability and
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An exact rational input to the candidate-correction algorithm.
Correct and certify a finite-chain stationary candidate: the procedure has finite loops over coordinates, matrix powers and finitely many column pairs, uses exact rational operations, and returns one of its specified statuses. A successful output has , correction , residual , and .
m-step Dobrushin certificate for a stationary probability: if , the stationary probability is unique and .
Proof
Given: P, y, m, and a successful certificate returned by the stated algorithm.
Proof technique: apply the residual theorem to the corrected probability and add the explicit correction distance.
The correction loop visits the coordinates once; computing uses the finite loop , and each matrix product and coefficient scan uses finitely many rational operations. The branches for invalid P, , , and each return a specified status or certificate. Thus the procedure terminates.
If the procedure returns certified, [F1] gives a column probability vector x, the exact residual , correction , and . By [F2], .
Since , the triangle inequality and [F1] give .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ilse C. F. Ipsen and Teresa M. Selee, Ergodicity Coefficients Defined by Vector Norms (standard reference, not scraped)
- Yuanyuan Liu, Perturbation Bounds for the Stationary Distributions of Markov Chains (standard reference, not scraped)