How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Correct and certify a finite-chain stationary candidate
Definition
Inputs. An integer , an exact rational matrix , an exact rational raw candidate , and an integer . The represented rational entries are the exact data for this certificate; certification proceeds only when P is column-stochastic, as checked in the first instruction.
Outputs. Return invalid-input if P has a negative entry or a column not summing exactly to one. Set and . If , return candidate-unavailable. Otherwise set and . Compute by and for . Compute and
If , return certificate-unavailable with the corrected candidate and computed quantities; do not report an accuracy bound. If , return certified with the candidate , correction ledger , residual , coefficient , and bound
All operations above use exact rational arithmetic and finitely many loops. If , the procedure reports no accuracy bound; if , it returns the stated exact bound. The procedure takes as input and makes no claim about how a stationary solver produced it.
Depends on
Used by
- Uniformized finite-generator stationary residual certificate Corollary
- A small residual can hide a large stationary error Example
- A three-state birth–death generator and detailed balance Example
- Periodic iteration can fail while the stationary solve is well-defined Example
- Two absorbing classes retain initial-law-dependent weights Example
- Separate stationary solve residual from generator error Theorem
- Termination and soundness of the corrected stationary residual certificate Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ilse C. F. Ipsen and Teresa M. Selee, Ergodicity Coefficients Defined by Vector Norms (standard reference, not scraped)
- Yuanyuan Liu, Perturbation Bounds for the Stationary Distributions of Markov Chains (standard reference, not scraped)