Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-28
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Courant-Fischer min-max principle for self-adjoint endomorphisms on finite-dimensional real inner product spaces

Statement

Let T:V→V be self-adjoint on an n-dimensional real inner product space, and list its eigenvalues in weakly decreasing order:

λ1≥λ2≥⋯≥λn.

Then for every 1≤k≤n,

λk=min⁡dim⁡W=n−k+1 max⁡0≠v∈WRT(v)=max⁡dim⁡U=k min⁡0≠v∈URT(v).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A self-adjoint endomorphism T:V→V of an n-dimensional real inner product space.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1algebra

By [L1], choose an orthonormal eigenbasis (e1,…,en) with Tej=λjej. For every nonzero v=∑jcjej, one has RT(v)=∑jλj∣cj∣2∑j∣cj∣2, so on Uk:=span⁡(e1,…,ek) every Rayleigh quotient is at least λk and on Wk:=span⁡(ek,…,en) every Rayleigh quotient is at most λk; equality holds at ek in both cases.

2.1L2step 1.1

Let W⊆V have dimension n−k+1. If W∩Uk={0}, then W⊆Uk⊥=span⁡(ek+1,…,en), whose dimension is n−k, contradicting [L2]. Thus some nonzero v∈W∩Uk satisfies RT(v)≥λk by step 1.1, so max⁡0≠v∈WRT(v)≥λk. Since step 1.1 also gives max⁡0≠v∈WkRT(v)=λk, the first Courant-Fischer equality follows.

3.1L2step 1.1∎

Let U⊆V have dimension k. If U∩Wk={0}, then U⊆Wk⊥=span⁡(e1,…,ek−1), whose dimension is k−1, contradicting [L2]. Thus some nonzero v∈U∩Wk satisfies RT(v)≤λk by step 1.1, so min⁡0≠v∈URT(v)≤λk. Since step 1.1 also gives min⁡0≠v∈UkRT(v)=λk, the second Courant-Fischer equality follows.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources