How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The generic rank-one DAHA polynomial representation is faithful
Statement
Let with algebraically independent. The polynomial representation of The equal-parameter double-affine Hecke algebra of type A1 from The rank-one DAHA polynomial representation is faithful over this formal parameter field. This item makes no coefficient-specialization claim; in particular, it does not claim faithfulness at root-of-unity .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The rank-one DAHA, its polynomial representation, the spanning normal words, and the q-affine substitutions acting on Laurent polynomials.
The rank-one DAHA polynomial representation: act by one affine substitution plus a Laurent-rational multiplication term, and the coefficient of the substitution part is .
Rank-one DAHA affine normal words span: every DAHA element is a finite linear combination of with alternating indices and .
Distinct rank-one q-affine substitutions are linearly independent: distinct affine substitutions are linearly independent as operators on with coefficients in .
The rank-one root datum and parameter conventions for DAHA: the extended affine group is , and each element has a unique form with an alternating reduced word in and .
Proof
Write each as in [F1], with . The rational function is nonzero: its numerator is nonzero because is a nonconstant monomial and . In the expansion of an alternating word , choosing the substitution term from every gives the affine substitution with a nonzero rational coefficient , a product of transforms of the nonzero . Every other term omits at least one reflection and therefore has affine Coxeter length strictly less than . The semidirect-product normal form in [F4] makes the top substitutions for distinct alternating words and distinct.
Suppose a finite linear combination of the spanning words in [F2] acts as zero, and choose the largest affine length among words with a nonzero coefficient. For any fixed top substitution of length , step 1.1 shows that its coefficient in the crossed-product expansion is exactly : shorter words and all lower terms have smaller length. By [F3], the coefficient of each substitution must vanish. Since , the Laurent polynomial is zero, so all its coefficients vanish. Repeating for the finitely many top substitutions of length and then descending in length shows that every coefficient in the original relation is zero.
The spanning family in [F2] has linearly independent images by step 2.1. Every element of the representation kernel is a finite linear combination of that spanning family, so it is zero. Thus the representation is injective and hence faithful.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Alexander A. Kirillov Jr., Lectures on the affine Hecke algebras and Macdonald conjectures (standard reference, not scraped)
- Pavel Etingof and Xiaoguang Ma, Lecture Notes on Cherednik Algebras (standard reference, not scraped)