Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rank-one DAHA affine normal words span

Statement

In the algebra of The equal-parameter double-affine Hecke algebra of type A1, every element is a finite K-linear combination of words

ZmTi1⋯Tirπϵ,

where m∈Z, ϵ∈{0,1}, r≥0, and adjacent indices in the string i1,…,ir∈{0,1} are distinct. This is a spanning statement only; no linear independence is asserted here.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The generator-and-relation algebra Hq,t(A1), its Bernstein relations, and its length-zero involution.

[F1]

The equal-parameter double-affine Hecke algebra of type A1: π2=1, πT0π=T1, (Ti−t)(Ti+t−1)=0, πZπ=q−1Z−1, and TiZm−si(Zm)Ti=(t−t−1)Bi,m(Z) for all integers m.

Proof

1.1F1givenalgebra

From π2=1 and πT0π=T1 one obtains πT0=T1π and πT1=T0π. Repeatedly use these identities to move every occurrence of π in an affine word to the right, and then use π2=1 to leave at most one π. The quadratic relation gives Ti2=(t−t−1)Ti+1, so induction on affine-word length reduces any word in T0,T1 to a finite linear combination of alternating strings. This proves the asserted form for words containing no Z letters.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra∎

From π2=1 and πZπ=q−1Z−1, conjugation gives πZmπ=q−mZ−m for every integer m, hence πZm=q−mZ−mπ. In a generator word, move each lattice letter left across π by this identity and across Ti by TiZm=si(Zm)Ti+(t−t−1)Bi,m(Z). Use lexicographic induction on (the number of T0,T1 letters, the number of out-of-order lattice/reflection pairs): a main term decreases the second coordinate, while a correction term is a finite Laurent sum with one fewer Hecke letter and decreases the first. After all lattice letters are on the left, move every π right using πT0=T1π, πT1=T0π and π2=1; each move decreases the number of π-before-Hecke pairs. Finally apply step 1.1 to reduce the remaining Hecke words to alternating strings. The process terminates and gives the asserted spanning form.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources