How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Rank-one DAHA affine normal words span
Statement
In the algebra of The equal-parameter double-affine Hecke algebra of type A1, every element is a finite -linear combination of words
where , , , and adjacent indices in the string are distinct. This is a spanning statement only; no linear independence is asserted here.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The generator-and-relation algebra , its Bernstein relations, and its length-zero involution.
The equal-parameter double-affine Hecke algebra of type A1: , , , , and for all integers .
Proof
From and one obtains and . Repeatedly use these identities to move every occurrence of in an affine word to the right, and then use to leave at most one . The quadratic relation gives , so induction on affine-word length reduces any word in to a finite linear combination of alternating strings. This proves the asserted form for words containing no letters.
From and , conjugation gives for every integer , hence . In a generator word, move each lattice letter left across by this identity and across by . Use lexicographic induction on (the number of letters, the number of out-of-order lattice/reflection pairs): a main term decreases the second coordinate, while a correction term is a finite Laurent sum with one fewer Hecke letter and decreases the first. After all lattice letters are on the left, move every right using , and ; each move decreases the number of -before-Hecke pairs. Finally apply step 1.1 to reduce the remaining Hecke words to alternating strings. The process terminates and gives the asserted spanning form.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Alexander A. Kirillov Jr., Lectures on the affine Hecke algebras and Macdonald conjectures (standard reference, not scraped)
- Pavel Etingof and Xiaoguang Ma, Lecture Notes on Cherednik Algebras (standard reference, not scraped)