Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A DARE residual, Stein inverse bound, and Lyapunov margin certify a stabilizing root

Statement

Let X^=X^∗ be a DARE candidate, S(X)=R+B∗XB, K(X)=S(X)−1B∗XA, Ac(X)=A−BK(X), and let Fd(X)=Q+A∗XA−A∗XBS(X)−1B∗XA−X. Suppose S(X^)⪰δ0I is outward-certified. For a proposed radius ρ>0 put a=∥A∥2,b=∥B∥2,m=∥X^∥F+ρ,δ=δ0−b2ρ. Require δ>0 and define LK=abδ+ab3mδ2,Mc=a+ab2mδ,Lc=bLK,LD=2McLc. Let D(E)=Ac(X^)∗EAc(X^)−E be invertible on Hermitian matrices, with outward-certified κ≥∥D−1∥F→F and r≥∥Fd(X^)∥F. If κ(r+LDρ2/2)≤ρ,κLDρ<1, there is exactly one Hermitian DARE root in the closed Frobenius ρ-ball, and R+B∗XB⪰δI throughout that ball.

For the stabilizing branch, additionally suppose A^c=Ac(X^) is Schur stable and an outward-certified W≻0 satisfies W−A^c∗WA^c⪰γI. If, with η=Lcρ, ∥W∥2(2Mcη+η2)<γ, then the root is Schur-stabilizing. Under the standard DARE hypotheses of Stabilizability and detectability give the unique stabilizing positive-semidefinite DARE solution, it is the unique stabilizing positive-semidefinite solution.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The DARE data and residual map of Standard CARE and DARE data, equations, and conventions, a Hermitian candidate, and the verified constants in the Statement.

[F1]

Standard CARE and DARE data, equations, and conventions: S(X)=R+B∗XB, Ac(X)=A−BS(X)−1B∗XA, and Fd(X)=Q+A∗XA−A∗XBS(X)−1B∗XA−X.

[F2]

Verified point and uniform linear residual certificate data specifies mathematical bounds for a linear approximate-inverse defect and preconditioned residual, and does not prescribe how to establish them. The DARE bounds used here are the separate hypotheses in [A1].

[F3]

Outward-rounded operations are inclusion-isotone and enclose DAG evaluations: a finite outward-rounded expression DAG encloses every exact node value.

[F4]

Spectral and Frobenius norms are unitarily invariant, are given by singular values, and satisfy the sharp rank comparison: ∥AXB∥F≤∥A∥2∥X∥F∥B∥2 and ∥X∥2≤∥X∥F.

[F6]

Stabilizability and detectability give the unique stabilizing positive-semidefinite DARE solution: under the standard discrete hypotheses there is a unique stabilizing positive-semidefinite DARE solution.

[F7]

Powers of a Schur-stable matrix decay geometrically up to a polynomial factor: if Ac is Schur stable, then ∣Ack∣2→0 geometrically.

[F8]

Every finite-dimensional normed space is Banach: every finite-dimensional normed space is complete, so a Cauchy sequence in the Hermitian matrix ball converges there.

[A1]

The lower eigenvalue bound δ0, norm bounds, residual bound, inverse bound κ, and Lyapunov margin are outward-verified inputs. If any bound is unavailable, this item supplies no certificate.

Proof

1.1F1A1F3F4F5algebra

For any Hermitian E with ∥E∥F≤ρ, [F3] and [F4] give S(X^+E)=S(X^)+B∗EB⪰(δ0−b2ρ)I=δI. Thus S(X) is invertible on the ball and ∥S(X)−1∥2≤δ−1. The resolvent identity gives ∥S(X)−1−S(Y)−1∥2≤b2δ−2∥X−Y∥F. Using K(X)=S(X)−1B∗XA and splitting the difference into the change in X and the change in S−1 yields ∥K(X)−K(Y)∥F≤LK∥X−Y∥F,∥Ac(X)∥2≤Mc,∥Ac(X)−Ac(Y)∥2≤Lc∥X−Y∥F.

2.1F1A1F4F5step 1.1algebra

Differentiating S−1S=I gives d(S−1)[E]=−S−1(B∗EB)S−1. Substituting this in the derivative of Fd and using K=S−1B∗XA gives Fd′(X)[E]=Ac(X)∗EAc(X)−E. Consequently, for DX=Fd′(X) and DY=Fd′(Y), [F4]–[F5] give ∥DX−DY∥F→F≤(∥Ac(X)∥2+∥Ac(Y)∥2)∥Ac(X)−Ac(Y)∥2≤LD∥X−Y∥F. Integrating the derivative along the segment from X^ to X^+E gives a Taylor remainder R(E) with Fd(X^+E)=Fd(X^)+D(E)+R(E),∥R(E)∥F≤LD∥E∥F2/2.

3.1A1F2F8step 2.1algebra

The root equation is the fixed-point equation E=T(E):=−D−1Fd(X^)−D−1R(E). The bounds in [A1], separate from the linear certificate data in [F2], make T a self-map of the closed ball. For E,F in that ball, integrating DX−D along the segment between them gives ∥R(E)−R(F)∥F≤LDρ∥E−F∥F, so T has contraction factor at most κLDρ<1. Iteration from zero has successive differences bounded by a geometric sequence, hence is Cauchy. The closed Hermitian ball is complete by [F8], so the sequence converges in the ball; continuity makes its limit a fixed point. The same contraction inequality makes it unique.

4.1A1F1F6F7step 3.1algebra∎

Let X=X^+E be the root. Then ∥Ac(X)−A^c∥2≤Lcρ=η. Expanding the Stein form, Ac(X)∗WAc(X)−A^c∗WA^c=A^c∗WΔ+Δ∗WA^c+Δ∗WΔ, where Δ=Ac(X)−A^c. Its norm is at most ∥W∥2(2Mcη+η2)<γ. Hence W−Ac(X)∗WAc(X)≻0. For an eigenvector Ac(X)v=λv, this gives (1−∣λ∣2)v∗Wv>0, so ∣λ∣<1. Let K=K(X), S=R+B∗XB, and xk+1=Ac(X)xk, uk=−Kxk. Since SK=B∗XA, we have K∗SK=A∗XBS−1B∗XA. Expanding Ac∗XAc=(A−BK)∗X(A−BK) gives Ac∗XAc=A∗XA−K∗SK−K∗SK+K∗B∗XBK=A∗XA−K∗SK−K∗RK. The DARE root equation therefore gives X=Q+K∗RK+Ac∗XAc, which along xk+1=Acxk and uk=−Kxk is the exact square identity xk∗Qxk+uk∗Ruk+xk+1∗Xxk+1=xk∗Xxk. Summing to N−1 yields x0∗Xx0=∑k<N(xk∗Qxk+uk∗Ruk)+xN∗XxN. By [F7], xN→0, so x0∗Xx0 is a sum of nonnegative terms; hence X⪰0. Now [F6] identifies it as the unique stabilizing positive-semidefinite solution.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

44 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources