Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

De rham cohomology of spheres

Statement

Assume countable choice. For n1, HdRk(Sn) is R in degrees 0,n and zero otherwise. For S0 it is R2 in degree zero and zero otherwise.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The unit sphere SnRn+1 and countable choice.

[F1]

Mayer vietoris sequence in de rham cohomology: Under countable choice the de Rham Mayer–Vietoris sequence is exact: Hk(M)rHk(U)Hk(V)sHk(UV)δHk+1(M), beginning with 0H0(M).

[F2]

Poincare lemma for differential forms on star shaped domains: Every closed smooth k-form on a star-shaped open domain is exact for k1. For centre 0, one primitive is ηx(v1,,vk1)=01tk1ωtx(x,v1,,vk1)dt.

[F3]

De rham cohomology is smooth homotopy invariant: A smooth homotopy equivalence induces an isomorphism of de Rham graded real algebras.

[F4]

Zero th de rham cohomology is locally constant functions: HdR0(M) is the algebra of locally constant real functions. For nonempty connected M it is canonically R.

[F5]

De rham cohomology of a finite disjoint union is the direct sum: For a finite disjoint union M=j=1mMj, restrictions give HdRk(M)j=1mHdRk(Mj).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For n1, write points as (x,z) and remove the poles to form U,V. Stereographic coordinates x/(1z) and x/(1+z) identify these opens with Rn; the first inverse is y(2y/(1+y2),(y21)/(1+y2)), and changing the sign of the last coordinate gives the second. Substitution verifies both inverses. Positive-degree cohomology of each open vanishes by Poincaré, and its degree-zero group is R.

F2F4given
2.1

The overlap is diffeomorphic to Sn1×R by (x,z)(x/x,z/x), with inverse (u,t)(u/1+t2,t/1+t2). The homotopy (u,t,s)(u,(1s)t) retracts it smoothly onto Sn1. For n=1 the overlap is two contractible components, so its H0 is R2 and its positive groups vanish. The map on H0 is (a,b)(ba,ba); its kernel is the diagonal and its cokernel is R, via (c,d)dc. Exactness therefore gives H0(S1)=H1(S1)=R. In degrees k2 the form spaces on this one-manifold vanish, so its cohomology also vanishes.

F1F3F5step 1.1
3.1

For n2 the overlap is connected: Sn1 is path connected, since non-antipodal points join by normalized line segments and antipodal points join through one perpendicular unit vector. Thus the degree-zero difference map is the surjection (a,b)ba onto R. Exactness gives H0(Sn)=R and H1(Sn)=0. For k2 both adjacent positive-degree groups of U,V vanish, so exactness gives Hk(Sn)Hk1(Sn1). Repeatedly applying this identity reaches the circle calculation or degree one, proving all asserted positive degrees. Negative degrees vanish by the complex convention. Finally S0 is two points, each with only Ω0=R, and finite disjoint union gives its stated groups.

F1F4F5step 1.1step 2.1

Source locator

Lee, Theorem 17.21, pp.450–451. The local proof replaces Lee’s fundamental-group input by the explicit degree-zero Mayer–Vietoris maps and avoids any later punctured-space computation.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources