How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Mayer vietoris sequence in de rham cohomology
Statement
Under countable choice the de Rham Mayer–Vietoris sequence is exact: , beginning with .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An open cover and countable choice.
Short exact mayer vietoris sequence of de rham complexes: Under countable choice, is short exact as a sequence of real cochain complexes.
De rham cohomology: The real de Rham cohomology is , with as in def-closed-and-exact-differential-forms. This is def-cohomology-object-of-a-cochain-complex in real vector spaces. Only a closed form represents a class . For closed forms , equality means precisely for some -form . Addition and real scalar multiplication are induced by those of forms. All groups on the empty manifold are zero.
The long exact sequence in cohomology: Let be a short exact sequence of cochain complexes in an abelian category. Then there is a natural exact sequence
Proof
The short exact sequence of de Rham cochain complexes satisfies the hypotheses of the cohomology long exact sequence theorem in the abelian category of real vector spaces. It gives the connecting map from overlap degree to global degree , with no additional differential sign.
For the middle complex, , so its cycle space is and its boundary space is . The quotient map sends to , bijectively: a pair maps to zero exactly when both entries have primitives. Thus its cohomology is the displayed direct sum. All negative-degree cohomology is zero by the definition of forms, giving the stated initial zero.
Source locator
Lee, Theorem 17.20, pp.449–450, and its full proof pp.462–463. This page reverses Lee’s difference convention consistently: .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, second edition (standard reference, not scraped)