Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Short exact mayer vietoris sequence of de rham complexes

Statement

Under countable choice, 0Ω(M)rΩ(U)Ω(V)sΩ(UV)0 is short exact as a sequence of real cochain complexes.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An open cover M=UV and countable choice.

[F1]

The de rham mayer vietoris sequence is exact at the first two terms: The sequence 0Ωk(M)rΩk(U)Ωk(V)sΩk(UV) is exact at the first two nonzero terms.

[F2]

The de rham mayer vietoris difference map is surjective: Assume countable choice. The difference map s:Ωk(U)Ωk(V)Ωk(UV) is surjective in every degree.

[F3]

Short exact sequence of complexes: A short exact sequence of complexes is a sequence of chain maps 0ABC0 that is exact in each degree as a sequence in the ambient abelian category.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

In every degree, the first lemma gives injectivity of r and kers=imr, and the second gives surjectivity of s. Hence each degree is a short exact sequence of real vector spaces.

F1F2given
2.1

The maps r,s commute with the differentials because they are the restriction cochain maps of those lemmas. Reindexing by Cn=Cn turns this into a sequence of chain maps exact in every degree, precisely the definition of a short exact sequence of complexes. Thus it is the claimed cochain version, including zero terms.

F3step 1.1

Source locator

Lee, Theorem 17.20, pp.449–450, and its full proof pp.462–463. This page reverses Lee’s difference convention consistently: s(α,β)=βα.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources