How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Explicit de rham mayer vietoris connecting class
Statement
Under countable choice, let be the Mayer–Vietoris connecting homomorphism obtained from the short exact cochain sequence in F3 by reindexing and using the connector convention in F4. For a closed -form on , , where and , with products smoothly extended by zero as in the lift construction. This class is independent of partition, lift and representative.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Assume countable choice. A closed overlap form and the partition lift .
Mayer vietoris sequence in de rham cohomology: Under countable choice the de Rham Mayer–Vietoris sequence is exact: , beginning with . Its proof obtains this by applying the long exact sequence theorem to the short exact de Rham cochain sequence in F3, with no additional differential sign.
The de rham mayer vietoris difference map is surjective: Assume countable choice. The difference map is surjective in every degree.
Short exact mayer vietoris sequence of de rham complexes: Under countable choice, is short exact as a sequence of real cochain complexes, with .
Elementwise formula for the connecting map in module categories: Let be a ring and let be a short exact sequence of chain complexes of left -modules. If is represented by a cycle , choose a lift with , and let be the unique element satisfying Then This class is independent of the chosen lift and of the chosen cycle representative .
Proof
On the overlap, . Thus the two smooth forms glue to . On each open or , hence is zero. The graded product rule also gives , fixing the sign.
Reindex the short exact sequence F3 as chain complexes with . By F1 its connecting homomorphism is the displayed , with no added sign. The lift in degree has differential in degree , so F4 gives in . Its independence of lift and cycle representative applies over the ring ; any other partition supplies another lift, so partition independence follows too.
Source locator
Lee, Theorem 17.20, pp.449–450, and its full proof pp.462–463. This page reverses Lee’s difference convention consistently: .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, second edition (standard reference, not scraped)