How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Yoneda embedding is its own pointwise left Kan extension
Statement
Let be small, and let be the Yoneda embedding. Then the identity functor on , together with the identity natural transformation on , is a pointwise left Kan extension of along .
Equivalently, for every presheaf , the comma-category colimit computing at is just itself.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A small category , its Yoneda embedding , and a presheaf on .
The density theorem expresses as the colimit of the diagram sending to (Density theorem for a small category).
Evaluation at the identity gives a natural bijection between morphisms and elements ; under this bijection the comma category is the category of elements of (For a presheaf , naturally in and , The category of elements of a covariant functor or a presheaf, The Yoneda assignment and the small-source Yoneda functor, traditionally called the Yoneda embedding).
A pointwise left Kan extension at is computed by the colimit over (Pointwise Kan extensions by the comma-category formula).
If comma-category colimits and their universal cocones are supplied at every target object, they assemble uniquely into a left Kan extension functor, with unit given by the identity-indexed legs (Comma-category limit and colimit formulae compute Kan extensions).
Proof
By [F1], the comma category is canonically the category of elements used in [L1], and under that identification its canonical diagram sends an object to the representable presheaf .
The colimit given by [L1] is therefore exactly the comma-category colimit required by [F2] to compute the pointwise left Kan extension of along itself at . That colimit object is .
For a natural transformation , the uniquely forced arrow between the two canonical density colimits is itself, because its composites with all Yoneda legs are the legs indexed by the elements . Thus the assembled arrow maps are those of the identity functor, and the identity-indexed unit legs are identities.
Since these canonical colimits are supplied for every presheaf, [L2] assembles them into a left Kan extension; steps 2.1 and 3.1 identify it with the identity functor and the identity transformation on . By [F2] it is pointwise.
Depends on
- Density theorem for a small category
- Comma-category limit and colimit formulae compute Kan extensions
- For a presheaf $P$, $\operatorname{Nat}(\mathcal C(-,a),P)\cong P(a)$ naturally in $a$ and $P$
- Pointwise Kan extensions by the comma-category formula
- The Yoneda assignment and the small-source Yoneda functor, traditionally called the Yoneda embedding
- The category of elements of a covariant functor or a presheaf
- Small, locally small, and large categories
- If $\mathcal C$ is small and $\mathcal D$ is locally small then $[\mathcal C,\mathcal D]$ is locally small; if both are small it is small
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- E. Riehl, Category Theory in Context, 2nd ed., Theorem 6.5.10 (standard reference, not scraped)
- B. Richter, From Categories to Homotopy Theory, Corollary 5.4.4 (standard reference, not scraped)