Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Yoneda embedding is its own pointwise left Kan extension

Statement

Let C be small, and let y:C[Cop,Set] be the Yoneda embedding. Then the identity functor on [Cop,Set], together with the identity natural transformation on y, is a pointwise left Kan extension of y along y.

Equivalently, for every presheaf P, the comma-category colimit computing Lanyy at P is just P itself.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A small category C, its Yoneda embedding y, and a presheaf P on C.

[L1]

The density theorem expresses P as the colimit of the diagram P[Cop,Set] sending (c,x) to y(c) (Density theorem for a small category).

[F1]

Evaluation at the identity gives a natural bijection between morphisms y(c)P and elements xP(c); under this bijection the comma category (yP) is the category of elements of P (For a presheaf P, Nat(C(,a),P)P(a) naturally in a and P, The category of elements of a covariant functor or a presheaf, The Yoneda assignment and the small-source Yoneda functor, traditionally called the Yoneda embedding).

[F2]

A pointwise left Kan extension at P is computed by the colimit over (yP) (Pointwise Kan extensions by the comma-category formula).

[L2]

If comma-category colimits and their universal cocones are supplied at every target object, they assemble uniquely into a left Kan extension functor, with unit given by the identity-indexed legs (Comma-category limit and colimit formulae compute Kan extensions).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [F1], the comma category (yP) is canonically the category of elements used in [L1], and under that identification its canonical diagram sends an object (c,x) to the representable presheaf y(c).

F1L1
2.1

The colimit given by [L1] is therefore exactly the comma-category colimit required by [F2] to compute the pointwise left Kan extension of y along itself at P. That colimit object is P.

F2step 1.1L1
3.1

For a natural transformation θ:PQ, the uniquely forced arrow between the two canonical density colimits is θ itself, because its composites with all Yoneda legs are the legs indexed by the elements θc(x). Thus the assembled arrow maps are those of the identity functor, and the identity-indexed unit legs are identities.

L1step 2.1
4.1

Since these canonical colimits are supplied for every presheaf, [L2] assembles them into a left Kan extension; steps 2.1 and 3.1 identify it with the identity functor and the identity transformation on y. By [F2] it is pointwise.

L2F2step 2.1step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources