Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-28
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Direct and inverse image of subobjects form a Galois connection

Statement

Let f:AA be a morphism in an abelian category. Then the direct-image map

f:Sub(A)Sub(A)

and the inverse-image map

f:Sub(A)Sub(A)

form a Galois connection:

fBCBfC.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A morphism f:AA and subobjects BA, CA.

[L1]

Direct image and inverse image are defined by image factorization and pullback respectively (Direct and inverse image of a subobject).

[L2]

A Galois connection between preorders is exactly a pair of monotone maps satisfying the displayed biconditional (Galois connection between preorders).

[L3]

The image of a morphism is the least subobject through which that morphism factors (The image is the least subobject through which a morphism factors).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Assume fBC. By [L1], the composite BAfA factors through the subobject CA. The pullback defining fC therefore gives a factorization of B through fC, so BfC.

L1construct
1.2

Assume BfC. Composing with the pullback leg fCC shows that the composite BA factors through C. By [L3], the image fB is the least subobject of A with that property, so fBC.

L1L3
2.1

Steps 1.1 and 1.2 prove the displayed biconditional, which is exactly the Galois-connection condition of [L2].

L2step 1.1step 1.2

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Direct and inverse image of a subobject.

Dependency tree · two levels

11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources