How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Strong converse for finite-alphabet DMCs
Statement
Let be a finite DMC with finite nonempty input and output alphabets and no input-cost constraint. For any sequence of length- codes with , the average success probability tends to zero; hence both average and maximal error tend to one.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite DMC and a sequence of deterministic length- codes with messages.
Finite DMC information capacity is attained and Capacity-achieving output laws bound every row divergence: a maximizing input law exists, and for every row is supported on with .
Uniform concentration around the capacity output divergence bound: for every fixed , uniformly over input words , the probability under that is at most .
Fixed-length codes for a finite DMC and Average and maximal error of a fixed-length code: the decoder regions are pairwise disjoint, and average success is .
Proof
By [F1] choose a maximizing input law and set . Fix a blocklength , a codeword , and a threshold . Split within the support of into outputs where and the supported complement. The first part has channel probability at most the threshold-tail probability in [F2]. On the supported complement, by the likelihood ratio; outside the support, , so the same inequality holds there. Hence the remaining channel probability is at most .
Average the bound in step 1.1 over messages. The tail term is at most uniformly by [F2]. Pairwise disjointness from [F3] gives , so average success is at most .
Choose such that eventually , which is possible by the strict liminf hypothesis. Set . Then , and step 2.1 bounds success by . Thus average error tends to one. Since maximal error is at least average error, it too tends to one.
Depends on
- Finite discrete memoryless channels
- The DMC product laws are stochastic kernels
- Fixed-length codes for a finite DMC
- Average and maximal error of a fixed-length code
- Single-letter information capacity of a finite DMC
- Finite DMC information capacity is attained
- Capacity-achieving output laws bound every row divergence
- Uniform concentration around the capacity output divergence bound
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Yury Polyanskiy and Yihong Wu, Information Theory: From Coding to Learning, Chapter 22 §22.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- MIT 6.441 Information Theory, Lecture 8, maximizing capacity (standard reference, not scraped)