How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Operational capacity formula for a finite DMC
Statement
For every finite DMC with no input-cost constraint, with rates and mutual information measured in nats per channel use.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite DMC with finite nonempty input and output alphabets.
Average-error and maximal-error DMC capacities: and are the suprema of rates achievable with vanishing average and maximal error, respectively.
Reliable average-error DMC rates do not exceed capacity: any vanishing-average-error code sequence has limsup rate at most .
Random coding achieves every rate below finite DMC capacity: every is achievable with vanishing average error.
Expurgation converts small average error to small maximal error: each code can be replaced by a subcode with rate loss at most and maximal error at most twice its average error.
Finite mutual information and Finite KL divergence is nonnegative with equality exactly at equal laws: mutual information is a finite KL divergence and is nonnegative, so .
Finite discrete memoryless channels and Fixed-length codes for a finite DMC and Average and maximal error of a fixed-length code: the nonempty input alphabet supplies one input word, and decoding every output to the sole message gives a one-message code with rate zero and zero error.
Proof
A maximal-error reliable sequence is also average-error reliable because . Thus [F3] gives .
By [F4], every is average-error achievable, so after taking the supremum when . If , [F7] gives . The case split is exhaustive by [F6]; in either case .
If , fix any . By [F4] there is an average-error reliable sequence at rate at least . Apply [F5] to each code: the maximal errors tend to zero and the log message count loses at most at blocklength , so the resulting rate is still at least in the limit. Thus for every such , and hence . If , [F7] gives . The cases are exhaustive by [F6], and step 1.1 gives equality.
Depends on
- Finite discrete memoryless channels
- Fixed-length codes for a finite DMC
- Average and maximal error of a fixed-length code
- Average-error and maximal-error DMC capacities
- Single-letter information capacity of a finite DMC
- Finite mutual information
- Finite KL divergence is nonnegative with equality exactly at equal laws
- Finite DMC information capacity is attained
- Expurgation converts small average error to small maximal error
- Reliable average-error DMC rates do not exceed capacity
- Random coding achieves every rate below finite DMC capacity
Used by
- An inactive DMC cost constraint recovers ordinary capacity Corollary
- Strict asymptotic separation need not give zero finite-block error Counterexample
- A finite-alphabet source-channel rate budget Example
- Capacity of the binary erasure channel Example
- Capacity of the binary symmetric channel Example
- Lossless separation for finite IID sources and finite DMCs Theorem
- Lossy separation for finite IID sources and finite DMCs Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Yury Polyanskiy and Yihong Wu, Information Theory: From Coding to Learning, Chapter 19 §§19.1–19.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Robert Gallager, Principles of Digital Communication I, Chapter 8 §§8.7.2–8.7.4, MIT OpenCourseWare (standard reference, not scraped)