How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite KL divergence is nonnegative with equality exactly at equal laws
Statement
For finite probability vectors on the same alphabet, , and if and only if . If for some coordinate, then .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Finite probability vectors on a common alphabet.
Finite distributions, entropy, divergence, and stochastic matrices: , with if for some .
Finite log-sum inequality with support and equality cases: for nonnegative vectors with positive sums , , with equality exactly when at every coordinate.
Proof
If for some , [F1] gives , so nonnegativity holds and equality to zero is impossible. Otherwise whenever ; apply [F2] to , . Both sums equal , and its left side is , so .
In the absolutely continuous case, [F2] says equality holds exactly when for every coordinate. Conversely, if , every positive-support term in [F1] is , so . Together with step 1.1 this proves the iff statement, including zero coordinates.
Depends on
Used by
- Fano bound for erasure and out-of-alphabet estimates Corollary
- Finite KL divergence is directional and may be infinite Counterexample
- Strict asymptotic separation need not give zero finite-block error Counterexample
- A degraded binary erasure wiretap channel Example
- A finite-alphabet source-channel rate budget Example
- Binary entropy and its extremizers Example
- Binary symmetric source: Slepian–Wolf corners and common part Example
- Capacity of the binary erasure channel Example
- Capacity of the binary symmetric channel Example
- Lossless Wyner-Ziv endpoint is the Slepian-Wolf rate Example
- Weak secrecy does not imply strong secrecy Example
- An average-cost DMC block input has mutual information at most n C_I(Gamma) Lemma
- Constrained DMC information capacity is attained, nondecreasing, and concave Lemma
- Convexity, monotonicity, and continuity of finite rate-distortion Lemma
- Fano bound for finite messages and density observations Lemma
- Fano's inequality for a finite message observed through a density Lemma
- Finite DMC resolvability by random codebooks Lemma
- Globally optimized constant-composition and Gallager functions agree Lemma
- A finite kernel criterion for perfect privacy Theorem
- Binary Hamming rate-distortion function Theorem
- Blahut–Arimoto certified gap and termination Theorem
- Finite conditional mutual information identities and equality Theorem
- Finite information quantities convert by the logarithm base Theorem
- Finite-alphabet Fano inequality Theorem
- Finite-alphabet memoryless Wyner-Ziv theorem Theorem
- Finite-DMC information deficit controls squared distance to the CAID set Theorem
- Lossy separation for finite IID sources and finite DMCs Theorem
- Operational capacity formula for a finite DMC Theorem
- Sphere-packing converse above the finite-divergence threshold Theorem
- Strong-secrecy capacity of a finite DMC wiretap channel Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Robert M. Gray, Entropy and Information Theory, corrected first edition (standard reference, not scraped)
- Yury Polyanskiy and Yihong Wu, Information Theory: From Coding to Learning, author prepublication (standard reference, not scraped)