Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite-DMC information deficit controls squared distance to the CAID set

Statement

Let W be a finite DMC, C=C(W), and Π={P:I(P,W)=C}. There is α>0, depending on W, such that every input law P satisfies C−I(P,W)≥α dist⁡2(P,Π)2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite DMC W, its capacity C, and its nonempty CAID set Π.

[F1]

The capacity-achieving output law is unique: every P∗∈Π induces one common output law Q∗.

[F2]

Capacity-achieving output laws bound every row divergence: every row Wx is supported on Q∗ and dx:=D(Wx∥Q∗)≤C.

[F3]

Finite mutual information and Finite Kullback–Leibler divergence: finite mutual information and KL are the support-aware finite sums in the direction D(P∥Q).

[F4]

Finite KL divergence is nonnegative with equality exactly at equal laws: finite KL is nonnegative and equals zero exactly when its probability vectors agree.

[F5]

Finite Pinsker inequality in Euclidean norm: D(R∥Q)≥12∥R−Q∥22 for finite probability vectors.

[F6]

Error bound for a finite simplex and affine slice: for a nonempty affine slice F of a finite simplex, dist⁡2(P,F)≤H∥MP−b∥2 for its defining linear map and target.

Proof

1.1F2F3givenalgebra

Fix a CAID and let Q∗ be its output. For every input law P, expanding the finite sums using [F2]–[F3] gives C−I(P,W)=∑xP(x)(C−dx)+D(PW∥Q∗). Indeed, ∑xP(x)dx−I(P,W)=∑y(PW)(y)ln⁡[(PW)(y)/Q∗(y)].

2.1F1F2F4step 1.1algebra

Put E={x:dx=C}. By [F2] and [F4], the right side of step 1.1 vanishes exactly when P(x)=0 for x∉E and PW=Q∗. Thus Π={P∈ΔX:P∣Ec=0, PW=Q∗}, a nonempty affine slice of the input simplex.

2.2F2F5step 1.1givenalgebra

If Ec≠∅, let η=min⁡x∉E(C−dx)>0. The first term in step 1.1 is at least η∥P∣Ec∥22, since P(x)∈[0,1] and ∑EcP(x)≥∥P∣Ec∥2≥∥P∣Ec∥22. By [F5], the second term is at least 12∥PW−Q∗∥22. Hence the gap is at least a times the squared norm of the concatenated residual (P∣Ec,PW−Q∗), with a=min⁡(η,1/2). If Ec=∅, omit that block and take a=1/2.

3.1F6step 2.1step 2.2casesalgebra∎

Apply [F6] to the slice in step 2.1 with linear map P↦(P∣Ec,PW) and target (0,Q∗), omitting the first component when Ec=∅. For its finite constant H, step 2.2 gives C−I(P,W)≥aH−2dist⁡2(P,Π)2. If Π is the whole simplex, the distance is identically zero and any positive α works; otherwise take α=aH−2>0.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources