How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite-DMC information deficit controls squared distance to the CAID set
Statement
Let be a finite DMC, , and . There is , depending on , such that every input law satisfies
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite DMC , its capacity , and its nonempty CAID set .
The capacity-achieving output law is unique: every induces one common output law .
Capacity-achieving output laws bound every row divergence: every row is supported on and .
Finite mutual information and Finite Kullback–Leibler divergence: finite mutual information and KL are the support-aware finite sums in the direction .
Finite KL divergence is nonnegative with equality exactly at equal laws: finite KL is nonnegative and equals zero exactly when its probability vectors agree.
Finite Pinsker inequality in Euclidean norm: for finite probability vectors.
Error bound for a finite simplex and affine slice: for a nonempty affine slice of a finite simplex, for its defining linear map and target.
Proof
Fix a CAID and let be its output. For every input law , expanding the finite sums using [F2]–[F3] gives Indeed, .
Put . By [F2] and [F4], the right side of step 1.1 vanishes exactly when for and . Thus , a nonempty affine slice of the input simplex.
If , let . The first term in step 1.1 is at least , since and . By [F5], the second term is at least . Hence the gap is at least times the squared norm of the concatenated residual , with . If , omit that block and take .
Apply [F6] to the slice in step 2.1 with linear map and target , omitting the first component when . For its finite constant , step 2.2 gives . If is the whole simplex, the distance is identically zero and any positive works; otherwise take .
Depends on
- The capacity-achieving output law is unique
- Capacity-achieving output laws bound every row divergence
- Finite DMC information capacity is attained
- Single-letter information capacity of a finite DMC
- Finite mutual information
- Finite Kullback–Leibler divergence
- Finite KL divergence is nonnegative with equality exactly at equal laws
- Finite Pinsker inequality in Euclidean norm
- Error bound for a finite simplex and affine slice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Yury Polyanskiy and Yihong Wu, Information Theory: From Coding to Learning, Chapter 22 §22.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Yury Polyanskiy, H. Vincent Poor, and Sergio Verdú, Channel Coding Rate in the Finite Blocklength Regime (standard reference, not scraped)