How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite DMC resolvability by random codebooks
Statement
Let be a finite DMC, let be an input probability vector, and let . On the joint support define and let . Set . For and any with , draw independent words and define the induced mixture
There is a , depending only on , for which
and
where . Thus both expected deviations tend to zero. Here is the directional finite KL divergence of Finite distributions, entropy, divergence, and stochastic matrices.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite DMC , an input law , a rate , and .
The DMC product laws are stochastic kernels: each block product law is a stochastic kernel.
Finite mutual information: under .
Finite KL divergence is nonnegative with equality exactly at equal laws: finite KL divergence is nonnegative.
Information-density concentration for a fixed finite DMC input law: for IID , has upper tail for some .
Information units and logarithm-base convention: unmarked logarithms are natural, so the displayed KL divergence and rates use nats.
Finite distributions, entropy, divergence, and stochastic matrices: finite KL is , with value if for some coordinate.
Proof
Write for the mixture in the Statement. Any with has , since each sampled codeword has letters in and any output reachable from such a letter has positive mass. Hence all divergences below are well-defined and finite.
For the total-variation bound, let on the support, let , set , and truncate to and . If , then the expected removed mass is exactly , and the missing mass is also , because . Since and , the triangle inequality gives After expectation, the first and third terms together contribute to total variation (the factor in its definition is included).
For fixed , expand as an expectation over a uniform index and then . Averaging over codebooks and using symmetry lets us take . The divergence and all rates use natural-log nats by [F6]. Conditional on , the remaining codewords are independent and For any finite positive random variable with law and mean , the vector is a probability vector; [F4] gives . Thus . Applying this finite Jensen inequality to the displayed likelihood ratio gives
On , and [F8] bound the logarithm by . On the complement, by the definition of , so . The complement has probability at most by [F5]. Splitting the expectation in step 2.1 across these two events proves the KL bound.
For fixed , let . The finite inequality follows by expanding . Independence of the codewords makes the cross terms vanish, so Since and the numerator is at most . Finite Cauchy–Schwarz with weights then gives where the middle inequality is finite Cauchy–Schwarz and . Together with step 1.2, this fluctuation contributes at most to expected total variation. Using [F5], , and gives the stated bound.
Depends on
- Finite discrete memoryless channels
- The DMC product laws are stochastic kernels
- Finite mutual information
- Information units and logarithm-base convention
- The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function
- Finite distributions, entropy, divergence, and stochastic matrices
- Finite KL divergence is nonnegative with equality exactly at equal laws
- Information-density concentration for a fixed finite DMC input law
- The natural logarithm is bounded above by its positive argument minus one
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Paul Cuff, Princeton ELE 538: Information Theoretic Security, Lecture 13 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Matthieu R. Bloch and J. Nicholas Laneman, Strong Secrecy from Channel Resolvability, arXiv:1105.5419 (standard reference, not scraped)