How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A fixed-rank DPLR bilinear recurrent step has linear arithmetic cost
Statement
Let , let with diagonal and , where denotes conjugate transpose, let , and let . If is invertible, then one bilinear recurrent update and its scalar output can be computed using exact complex arithmetic operations and working space. For fixed , this is operations and space. When the diagonal base is invertible, the required Woodbury correction is invertible. When that diagonal base is singular but is invertible, the bordered correction in the recurrent algorithm is invertible and has size at most .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The dimensions, DPLR matrices, step size, and invertibility hypothesis from the Statement.
DPLR structured state-space parameterization: and ; the recurrent right-hand side is and the output is after solving for .
Woodbury inverse for a diagonal-plus-low-rank update: if is invertible, then is invertible exactly when is invertible, and its inverse is .
S4 state-space recurrence and convolution procedure: for a singular diagonal base, the algorithm partitions its zero and nonzero coordinates and solves the displayed bordered system of dimension , then sets .
Proof
Put and . For a current state and input , form . Diagonal scaling costs operations, the two low-rank products cost , and the remaining vector additions cost . The solve is with .
If every diagonal entry of is nonzero, apply [F2] with and . Since is invertible, the correction is invertible, and . Forming and costs operations and space; factoring costs . Applying the inverse to one right-hand side costs operations. Thus this branch meets the stated bounds.
Otherwise let , , and . The rows of indexed by are those of , whose rank is at most . If , these rows are linearly dependent, so is singular, contrary to the hypothesis. Hence .
Suppose and consider a homogeneous solution of the bordered system in [F3]. Set . The first bordered row gives , while its lower row gives . Therefore the rows of equal , and the rows equal . Invertibility of implies , hence and . The square bordered matrix has trivial kernel and is therefore invertible.
For any right-hand side, solve the bordered system, define , and keep the solved . Its first row states ; the upper coordinate equations then give , and the lower row gives . Thus is the unique solution to . The bordered dimension is ; forming it and its right-hand side costs operations and space, and factoring/solving it costs . Computing adds . Both branches satisfy the claimed fixed-rank linear bounds.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gu, Goel, and Ré, Efficiently Modeling Long Sequences with Structured State Spaces, Theorem 2 and Appendix C.2 (standard reference, not scraped)