How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
For an infinite Hamel basis, its dual family is linearly independent but does not span the algebraic dual
Statement
Let be an infinite Hamel basis of . Its dual family is linearly independent in but does not span .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An infinite Hamel basis of and its dual family.
The dual family satisfies for (The dual family associated to a Hamel basis , defined by ).
Linear independence tests only finite linear relations (Linear independence: a finite list is independent when forces every , and a subset is independent when every injective finite list into is independent).
A Hamel basis is a linearly independent spanning set, with span defined through finite linear combinations (Basis of a vector space: a linearly independent spanning subset; and ordered basis: an injective finite list whose image is a basis).
Proof
If a finite relation holds, evaluating it at each gives by [L1]. Thus the dual family is linearly independent by [L2].
By [L3], every vector has a finite basis expansion. It is unique after zero coefficients are discarded, because subtracting two such expansions gives a finite relation in the independent set . Hence is well defined and linear, and for every .
Every finite linear combination of members of the dual family vanishes at all basis vectors outside its finite support. Since is infinite while for every , is not in their span.
The dual family is therefore independent but not spanning, so it is not a Hamel basis of .
Depends on
- The dual family $(b^*)_{b\in B}$ associated to a Hamel basis $B$, defined by $b^*(c)=\delta_{bc}$
- Linear independence: a finite list $v : n \to V$ is independent when $\sum_{i<n} \lambda_i v_i = 0_V$ forces every $\lambda_i = 0_F$, and a subset $S \subseteq V$ is independent when every injective finite list into $S$ is independent
- Basis of a vector space: a linearly independent spanning subset; and ordered basis: an injective finite list whose image is a basis
Used by
- In infinite dimension, distinct subspaces of V^* can have the same preannihilator Counterexample
- For the polynomial space F[x], the canonical map to the algebraic double dual is injective but not surjective Example
- Assuming choice, J_V:V→ V^** is surjective if and only if V is finite-dimensional Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 53 results over 18 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- K. Conrad, Infinite-Dimensional Dual Spaces, Theorem 1 (standard reference, not scraped)