Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

For the polynomial space F[x], the canonical map to the algebraic double dual is injective but not surjective

Example

Assume the axiom of choice. For the polynomial vector space V=F[x], the canonical map JV:VV is injective but not surjective.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The axiom of choice and a field F.

[L1]

A polynomial over F is a coefficient sequence with finite support (The polynomial ring over a commutative ring as finitely supported coefficient sequences with convolution).

[L2]

Under Choice, the canonical map is onto exactly in finite dimension and is always injective (Assuming choice, JV:VV is surjective if and only if V is finite-dimensional).

[L3]

The coordinate functionals of an infinite Hamel basis span a proper subspace of the dual (For an infinite Hamel basis, its dual family is linearly independent but does not span the algebraic dual), and a vector outside a subspace can be separated from it by a functional (Assuming choice, if vUV, some fV vanishes on U and satisfies f(v)=1).

Verification

technique · explicit double-dual witness
1.1

By [L1], the monomials 1,x,x2, form an infinite Hamel basis. Let δn extract the coefficient of xn, and put Φ=span{δn:n0}. Define ϕ(nanxn)=nan; finite support makes this a functional. Every member of Φ vanishes on all but finitely many monomials, whereas ϕ(xn)=1 for every n, so ϕΦ.

L1L3algebra
2.1

Apply the separation statement in [L3] inside V to choose LV with LΦ=0 and L(ϕ)=1. If L=JV(p), then 0=L(δn)=δn(p) for every n, so all coefficients of p vanish and p=0; this would give L=0, contradicting L(ϕ)=1.

step 1.1L3choose
3.1

Thus L is outside the image, while injectivity follows from [L2]. This explicitly realizes the finite-dimensional boundary in [L2].

step 2.1L2

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 48 results over 14 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources