Alphabeta Math

Dual Spaces and Bilinear Forms: Examples and Counterexamples

About this page
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 12 results · all verified · 2 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 10 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.
1 · Prerequisites
2 · Logical flowchart

3 · Items

Example

A dual basis and transpose computed for a linear map on F₃²

Example

The annihilator of the coordinate plane z=0 in ℝ³ is the line spanned by the third coordinate functional

Example

For the polynomial space F[x], the canonical map to the algebraic double dual is injective but not surjective

Counterexample

In infinite dimension, distinct subspaces of V^* can have the same preannihilator

Example

The form on ℝ² with matrix beginpmatrix0&10&0 endpmatrix is neither symmetric nor alternating

Example

q(x,y)=2x²+4xy+5y²=2(x+y)²+3y² has inertia (2,0,0)

Example

A rank-two alternating form on ℝ³ has one symplectic pair and a one-dimensional radical

Counterexample

In characteristic 2, a symmetric bilinear form need not have an orthogonal basis

Counterexample

In characteristic 2, distinct quadratic forms can have the same polar form

Counterexample

Positive determinant does not imply positive definiteness

Example

Sylvester's criterion verifies positive definiteness for a concrete symmetric 3×3 matrix

Counterexample

Congruence need not preserve trace or determinant: the real 1×1 matrices [1] and [4] are congruent

Sources