How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Alternating forms are skew-symmetric; the converse holds when , while in characteristic alternating forms are symmetric
Statement
Every alternating bilinear form is skew-symmetric. If , every skew-symmetric bilinear form is alternating. If , every alternating bilinear form is symmetric.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A bilinear form .
Alternating means for all , skew-symmetric means , and symmetric means (Bilinear forms, and symmetric, skew-symmetric, and alternating bilinear forms).
The characteristic is the least positive natural multiple of that is zero, or if none exists (The characteristic of a ring: the least with when one exists, and otherwise); a field has and every nonzero element is invertible (Field).
Proof
If is alternating, bilinearity gives , so and is skew-symmetric.
If is skew-symmetric, then , so . When , [L2] makes nonzero and invertible, giving for every and hence alternation.
If and is alternating, [L2] gives and hence for every . Step 1.1 therefore gives , so is symmetric.
These arguments prove each asserted implication without claiming that every symmetric form in characteristic is alternating.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 48 results over 15 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- K. Conrad, Bilinear Forms, §4 (standard reference, not scraped)