Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Congruence need not preserve trace or determinant: the real 1×1 matrices [1] and [4] are congruent

Statement refuted

Refuted claim: Matrix congruence preserves trace or determinant.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The real 1×1 matrices A=[1], C=[4], and P=[2].

[L1]

Congruence has the form C=PTAP with P invertible (A basis change by P changes the matrix of a bilinear form from A to PTAP).

Counterexample

technique · direct $1\times1$ computation
1.1

Since PTAP=[2][1][2]=[4]=C and P is invertible, [L1] makes A and C congruent.

L1algebra
1.2

By [L3], trA=1, trC=4, detA=1, and detC=4. Thus neither trace nor determinant is preserved.

L3algebra
2.1

Both matrices nevertheless have rank 1 and are nondegenerate, in agreement with [L2]; the counterexample isolates exactly the two false invariance claims.

step 1.1step 1.2L2

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 73 results over 15 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.