Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-09-26 (gpt-6-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Effective dimension is the liminf prefix-complexity rate

Statement

For every X∈2ω, dim⁡(X)=lim inf⁡n→∞K(X↾n)/n.

Proof

Given: X∈2ω.

1.1given

Let an effective s-gale d succeed on X, and fix a rational t>s. For n≥1 enumerate En={σ∈2n:d(σ)>1}, possible because d is lower semicomputable. Iterating the gale identity gives ∑∣σ∣=nd(σ)=2snd(∅), so ∣En∣<2snd(∅). Choose an integer c such that ∣En∣<2⌈tn⌉+c for every n. Such a fixed c exists since t>s and d(∅) is finite (Effective Hausdorff dimension).

1.2given

For the reverse inequality write a=lim inf⁡nK(X↾n)/n, which is finite since a self-delimiting code for n followed by n bits gives K(X↾n)≤n+O(log⁡n). Independently choose rationals q,t with a<q<t. Let U be the fixed optimal prefix-free machine. For each halted program p with output σ, put mass 2−∣p∣ uniformly on the cylinder [σ]: its value on a cylinder [τ] is 2−∣p∣ if τ⪯σ, 2−∣p∣−∣τ∣+∣σ∣ if σ≺τ, and 0 if τ and σ are incompatible. Denote the sum of these values over all halted p by μ([τ]). Kraft's inequality (Kraft inequality and effective prefix-code allocation) gives μ([∅])≤1; each summand is nonnegative and obeys μp([τ])=μp([τ0])+μp([τ1]), so the sum has the same identity.

2.1step 1.1

Give n a computable self-delimiting code of length O(log⁡n), followed by a fixed-length ⌈tn⌉+c-bit index into the enumeration of En. These codes form a prefix-free machine: the first code identifies n, and all following indices then have the same length. Its output on an index is the corresponding enumerated string when that index appears. Thus, by optimality of K (Invariance theorem for prefix complexity), each σ∈En has K(σ)≤tn+O(log⁡n). Success of d makes d(X↾n)>1 at infinitely many, hence unboundedly many, lengths n. It follows that lim inf⁡nK(X↾n)/n≤t. Since rational t>s was arbitrary, the liminf is at most s, and therefore at most dim⁡(X).

3.1step 1.2∎

Set dt(τ)=2t∣τ∣μ([τ]). Because t is rational and the halted computations can be enumerated, dt is lower semicomputable; the preceding identity makes it an effective t-gale (Effective Hausdorff dimension). At any σ with a shortest program p, its contribution alone gives dt(σ)≥2t∣σ∣−K(σ) (Prefix-free machines and prefix complexity). There are infinitely many lengths n with K(X↾n)<qn by the definition of the liminf. On them dt(X↾n)>2(t−q)n, which tends to infinity. Thus dt succeeds and dim⁡(X)≤t. Letting rational t decrease to a completes the equality.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources