How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Invariance theorem for prefix complexity
Statement
An optimal prefix-free machine exists. After fixing one , write .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: an acceptable enumeration of all partial computable description machines.
Proof
Dovetail the computations of on all inputs. Whenever a convergence first appears, retain it only if is prefix-comparable with no previously retained input for that same . The retained graph defines a partial computable machine with prefix-free domain. If already has prefix-free domain, no convergence is discarded, so .
Choose a computable prefix-free self-delimiting code (for example ) and set . The universal simulation supplied by Universal and acceptable numberings, together with the effective filter in step 1.1, makes partial computable.
Distinct are prefix-free and each has prefix-free domain, so the domain of is prefix-free. For every prefix-free machine , step 1.1 gives , and therefore . Thus is optimal by Prefix-free machines and prefix complexity.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Shen, §36 (standard reference, not scraped)