How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Levin--Schnorr characterization of Martin-Löf randomness
Statement
is Martin-Löf random iff some constant satisfies for every .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: and fixed optimal prefix complexity.
Proof
For , let The sequence is uniformly effectively open: dovetail the fixed prefix machine and enumerate at level when a description shorter than appears. Choose one shortest program for each such . These programs are distinct and belong to a prefix-free domain, so Kraft inequality and effective prefix-code allocation gives Thus is a Martin-Löf test. If the deficiencies are unbounded, then for every , so is not random.
Conversely, suppose fails a Martin-Löf test . For each , turn the enumeration of into a computable disjoint cylinder cover: when a cylinder arrives, enumerate a finite prefix-free partition of the part not covered at earlier stages. For every resulting cylinder , issue the request . Its length is nonnegative because one such cylinder already has measure at most , and the total request weight is The effective allocation clause of Kraft inequality and effective prefix-code allocation therefore gives a prefix-free machine with for every request. Prefix optimality Invariance theorem for prefix complexity supplies a constant with . Since , for every one of the covering strings gives deficiency at least . Hence the prefix deficiencies of are unbounded.
Step 1.1 says bounded deficiency is necessary for randomness, while step 1.2 says nonrandomness forces unbounded deficiency. Taking contrapositives under Martin-Löf tests and random sequences proves the equivalence.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Shen, §38 (standard reference, not scraped)