Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Levin--Schnorr characterization of Martin-Löf randomness

Statement

X∈2ω is Martin-Löf random iff some constant c satisfies K(X↾n)≥n−c for every n.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: X∈2ω and fixed optimal prefix complexity.

Proof

1.1givenconstruct

For k≥0, let Vk=⋃{[σ]:K(σ)<∣σ∣−k}. The sequence is uniformly effectively open: dovetail the fixed prefix machine and enumerate σ at level k when a description shorter than ∣σ∣−k appears. Choose one shortest program pσ for each such σ. These programs are distinct and belong to a prefix-free domain, so Kraft inequality and effective prefix-code allocation gives μ(Vk)≤∑σ2−∣σ∣≤2−k∑σ2−∣pσ∣≤2−k. Thus (Vk) is a Martin-Löf test. If the deficiencies n−K(X↾n) are unbounded, then X∈Vk for every k, so X is not random.

1.2givenconstruct

Conversely, suppose X fails a Martin-Löf test (Uj). For each k, turn the enumeration of U2k+2 into a computable disjoint cylinder cover: when a cylinder arrives, enumerate a finite prefix-free partition of the part not covered at earlier stages. For every resulting cylinder [σ], issue the request (σ,∣σ∣−k). Its length is nonnegative because one such cylinder already has measure at most μ(U2k+2)≤2−2k−2, and the total request weight is ∑k2kμ(U2k+2)≤∑k2−k−2≤1. The effective allocation clause of Kraft inequality and effective prefix-code allocation therefore gives a prefix-free machine M with KM(σ)≤∣σ∣−k for every request. Prefix optimality Invariance theorem for prefix complexity supplies a constant d with K(σ)≤∣σ∣−k+d. Since X∈U2k+2, for every k one of the covering strings σ≺X gives deficiency at least k−d. Hence the prefix deficiencies of X are unbounded.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2∎

Step 1.1 says bounded deficiency is necessary for randomness, while step 1.2 says nonrandomness forces unbounded deficiency. Taking contrapositives under Martin-Löf tests and random sequences proves the equivalence.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources