How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Empirical measures of iid euclidean samples converge weakly
Statement
For IID -valued samples with common law and finite , the empirical probabilities converge weakly to almost surely on one common event.
Facts & Assumptions
Countable compactly supported tests determine euclidean weak convergence: For each finite there is a countable uniformly dense subset of containing nonnegative compact cutoffs . If Borel probabilities have for every , then .
Measurable coordinatewise functions preserve independence: Let be an independent family of random elements . For each , let be measurable. Then the family is independent.
Change of variables for expectation: Let be a random element, let be its law, and let or be measurable.
- If , then
- If is integrable, then is integrable with respect to and the same formula holds:
Kolmogorov iid l1 strong law: For IID real with , almost surely.
Finite and countable subadditivity of measures: Let be a measure and let be measurable. Then
For every one also has
including , where both sides are .
Proof
Given: The objects, hypotheses and definitions in the statement. Its conclusions are to be established below.
For each sample outcome, is a probability: finite sums of the unit point masses are countably additive and its total mass is n/. For a bounded continuous h, .
Let D be the countable class in F1. For every h in D, F2 makes h() IID; they are bounded and hence integrable. F3 gives their mean . F4 yields convergence of the corresponding empirical test integrals.
Each test convergence event is measurable, by the countable real convergence criterion. F5 shows that the intersection over D of the conull events in step 1.2 is conull. On it all the test integrals converge simultaneously. The determining implication in F1 gives weak convergence for each such outcome.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Durrett, strong law Theorem 2.5.10 plus countable-test argument (standard reference, not scraped)