Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Equality in Minkowski's inequality for 1<p<∞

Statement

Let 1<p<∞ and let f,g∈Lp(μ). Then equality holds in Minkowski's inequality

∥f+g∥p=∥f∥p+∥g∥p

if and only if at least one of f,g is zero almost everywhere, or there is a constant λ>0 such that

f=λgμ-almost everywhere.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An exponent 1<p<∞ and functions f,g∈Lp(μ).

[L1]

Minkowski's inequality has already been proved (Minkowski's inequality for integrals, including p=∞).

[L2]

The equality case in Holder has already been proved (Equality in Holder's inequality for 1<p<∞).

[L3]

A nonnegative measurable function has integral 0 exactly when it vanishes almost everywhere (A nonnegative measurable function has integral 0 exactly when it vanishes almost everywhere).

[L4]

The nonnegative integral is additive (Additivity of the nonnegative Lebesgue integral).

Proof

technique · Examine the Holder step in the standard proof of Minkowski. Equality forces the nonnegative functions $|f|$ and $|g|$ to be proportional almost everywhere, and the pointwise triangle inequality then forces the same sign
1.1L1given

If at least one of f,g is zero almost everywhere, then equality is immediate.

1.2L1given

If f=λg almost everywhere for some λ>0, then [L1, given] ∣f+g∣=(λ+1)∣g∣ almost everywhere, so ∥f+g∥p=(λ+1)∥g∥p=∥f∥p+∥g∥p.

1.3L1L2L3L4

Conversely, assume equality in Minkowski and that neither f nor g is zero almost everywhere. [L1, L2, L3, L4] The proof of [L1] showed that equality in Minkowski can only occur when both inequalities ∣f+g∣≤∣f∣+∣g∣ and ∫∣f∣ ∣f+g∣p−1 dμ≤∥f∥p∥f+g∥pp−1 and its g-analogue are equalities. The second and third equalities force the pairs (∣f∣,∣f+g∣p−1) and (∣g∣,∣f+g∣p−1) to satisfy Holder equality. By [L2], this makes ∣f∣ and ∣g∣ proportional almost everywhere. The first inequality then forces (∣f∣+∣g∣)−∣f+g∣ to have integral 0; [L3] and [L4] therefore give ∣f+g∣=∣f∣+∣g∣μ-almost everywhere.

2.1step 1.3algebra

Let ∣f∣=c∣g∣ almost everywhere with c>0. Then [step 1.3, algebra] on the set where g≠0, step 1.3 gives equality in the real triangle inequality for f and g, so they have the same sign there. Hence f=cg almost everywhere on {g≠0}, and on {g=0} both sides vanish. Thus f=λg almost everywhere for λ=c>0.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3step 2.1∎

Steps 1.1 and 1.2 prove sufficiency, while steps 1.3 and 2.1 prove necessity.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources