How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Equivalence of Euler–Lagrange and Hamilton equations for hyperregular Lagrangians
Statement
Assume . Let be hyperregular and . The Legendre map bijects Euler–Lagrange trajectories with Hamiltonian trajectories of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A hyperregular and its associated .
Euler–Lagrange equations are . Euler–Lagrange equations.
With and inverse , . Energy and Hamiltonian of a hyperregular Lagrangian.
Hamilton's equations are and . Hamilton equations in canonical cotangent coordinates.
Proof
Differentiate the formula in [F2]. Since , the and terms cancel, giving . Hence and .
If satisfies [F1] and , then step 1.1 gives and . Thus satisfies [F3].
Conversely, a Hamiltonian trajectory satisfies by [F3] and step 1.1, so inverse Legendre gives . Its second Hamilton equation then reads , which is [F1]. Hyperregularity makes both assignments global inverses.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ana Cannas da Silva, Lectures on Symplectic Geometry (standard reference, not scraped)