Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Erdős–Stone–Simonovits: ex⁡(n,H)=(1−1/(χ(H)−1)+o(1))(n2) for every graph with an edge

Statement

Let H be a finite graph with at least one edge and put r=χ(H)≥2. Then

ex⁡(n,H)=(1−1r−1+o(1))(n2).

Equivalently,

lim⁡n→∞ex⁡(n,H)(n2)=1−1χ(H)−1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The hypotheses and notation of the statement above.

[F1]

A proper k-vertex-colouring is a map c:V→k with c(u)≠c(v) for every edge {u,v}, its fibres are the colour classes, and χ(G)=min⁡{k∈N:G is k-colourable} (Proper vertex colourings and chromatic number).

[F2]

For n∈N and r≥1, Turán's theorem gives ex⁡(n,Kr+1)=e(Tn,r), and an n-vertex Kr+1-free graph attains equality exactly when it is isomorphic to Tn,r (Turán's theorem with equality: ex⁡(n,Kr+1)=e(Tn,r), and Tn,r is the unique extremal graph).

[F3]

Every finite graph of chromatic number r embeds as an ordinary subgraph of Kr[s] for some s≥1 (Every finite graph H with χ(H)=r is an ordinary subgraph of Kr[s] for some s).

[F4]

For r≥2 and s≥1, π(Kr[s])=1−1/(r−1) (Erdős–Stone for balanced blowups: π(Kr[s])=1−1/(r−1) for r≥2).

Proof

technique · sandwich $H$ between a Turán graph and a balanced blowup
1.1

Every (r−1)-partite graph is H-free, since every subgraph of it is (r−1)-colourable while χ(H)=r. Therefore Tn,r−1 gives lim inf⁡n→∞ex⁡(n,H)/(n2)≥1−1/(r−1).

givenF1F2
1.2

The embedding lemma gives an s≥1 with H⊆Kr[s]. Hence every H-free graph is Kr[s]-free, and balanced-blowup Erdős–Stone gives lim sup⁡n→∞ex⁡(n,H)/(n2)≤1−1/(r−1).

givenF3F4
2.1

The two bounds agree, proving the limit and the o(1) formulation. When r=2, the expression is 0 and the same proof uses Tn,1 for the lower bound and K2[s] for the upper bound, so the bipartite boundary is included.

step 1.1step 1.2givenF4∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources