Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The asymptotic extremal density is determined exactly by chromatic number: π(H)=11/(χ(H)1)

Statement

For every finite graph H with at least one edge,

π(H)=11χ(H)1.

In particular, two such graphs have the same Turán density exactly when they have the same chromatic number, and every bipartite H has density 0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The hypotheses and notation of the statement above.

[F1]

If H is a finite graph with an edge and r=χ(H), then ex(n,H)=(11/(r1)+o(1))(n2) (Erdős–Stone–Simonovits: ex(n,H)=(11/(χ(H)1)+o(1))(n2) for every graph with an edge).

[F2]

For every finite graph H with an edge, the normalized extremal numbers converge to π(H), their infimum over n2 (Every finite graph with an edge has a Turán density π(H)=limnex(n,H)/(n2)).

[F3]

Every finite bipartite graph with an edge has Turán density zero (Every bipartite graph with at least one edge has Turán density zero).

Proof

technique · identify the existing limit
1.1

Erdős–Stone–Simonovits states that the normalized extremal number tends to 11/(χ(H)1), while the definition of π(H) is that same existing limit. This proves the formula.

givenF1F2
2.1

For integers r2, the function 11/(r1) is strictly increasing, so equal values are equivalent to equal chromatic numbers. At r=2 it is 0, agreeing with the KST-derived bipartite corollary.

step 1.1givenF3
3.1

Steps 1.1-2.1 prove the exact density statement and both consequences.

step 1.1step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 39 results over 12 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources