Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-12
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Every Brauer pair determines a unique global block

Statement

Every local Brauer pair (P,e) belongs to exactly one global block b of kG. Conjugate local pairs belong to the same global block, and comparable local pairs belong to the same global block.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite group G, a field k of characteristic p, and local Brauer pairs.

[F1]

Every subgroup of a pair has a unique subpair; at a normal subgroup inclusion is normal inclusion. (Brauer pair order is independent of the normal chain)

[F2]

Conjugation commutes with Brauer projection. (Brauer homomorphism is conjugation equivariant)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Apply unique descent to 1P. Its unique pair (1,b) has b a block of kCG(1)=kG. Since 1P, the normal criterion says exactly that b is P-fixed and BrP(b)e=e. A global block is central, hence P-fixed. Thus descent is equivalent to membership, proving existence and uniqueness of the global block.

F1
2.1

For gG, centrality gives gb=b; equivariance gives BrgP(b)ge=g(BrP(b)e)=ge. Therefore conjugate pairs have the same block by step 1.1. If (Q,f)(P,e), the unique descent (1,c) below (Q,f) is below (P,e) by transitivity. Its uniqueness forces c=b.

F1F2step 1.1

Sources

Jacobsen, Block fusion systems and the center of the group ring, Lemma 2.32 and Theorem 2.33, pp.18–19; general-field lifting proved locally. Local argument and conventions as displayed above.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources