Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-12
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Brauer homomorphism is conjugation equivariant

Statement

For g∈G and a∈(kG)P, write ga=gag−1 and gP=gPg−1. Then ga∈(kG)gP and Br⁡gP(ga)=gBr⁡P(a).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: G,P,g,a as stated.

[F1]

The map retains centralizer coefficients. (Brauer homomorphism for a p subgroup)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1

For p∈P, conjugating ga by gpg−1 gives gpap−1g−1=gag−1, proving the required fixed-algebra membership. Also x∈CG(P) holds exactly when gxg−1∈CG(gPg−1), by conjugating each commutation equation.

2.1F1step 1.1∎

Writing a=∑xaxx, either order of conjugation and truncation yields ∑x∈CG(P)axgxg−1. This is the required equality; no coefficient is changed.

Sources

Webb, A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory, §§11.3, 11.6 and 12.3–12.5, especially pp.240–245. Local argument and conventions as displayed above.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources