Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-12
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Brauer homomorphism is conjugation equivariant

Statement

For gG and a(kG)P, write ga=gag1 and gP=gPg1. Then ga(kG)gP and BrgP(ga)=gBrP(a).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: G,P,g,a as stated.

[F1]

The map retains centralizer coefficients. (Brauer homomorphism for a p subgroup)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For pP, conjugating ga by gpg1 gives gpap1g1=gag1, proving the required fixed-algebra membership. Also xCG(P) holds exactly when gxg1CG(gPg1), by conjugating each commutation equation.

F1
2.1

Writing a=xaxx, either order of conjugation and truncation yields xCG(P)axgxg1. This is the required equality; no coefficient is changed.

F1step 1.1

Sources

Webb, A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory, §§11.3, 11.6 and 12.3–12.5, especially pp.240–245. Local argument and conventions as displayed above.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources