How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Brauer homomorphism is multiplicative
Statement
The Brauer map is a unital surjective -algebra homomorphism.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite group, characteristic- field, and a -subgroup .
The Brauer map retains exactly the coefficients centralizing . (Brauer homomorphism for a p subgroup)
Non-singleton orbits of a finite -group have size divisible by . (If a finite -group acts on a finite set , then )
Proof
Let and be -fixed and fix . The coefficient of in is . Conjugation by preserves the indexing set, since centralizes , and preserves each coefficient product. Each non-singleton orbit contributes its cardinality times one coefficient, which is zero in characteristic . The singleton pairs are precisely those with both . Hence this coefficient equals that of in .
Equality at each basis element proves multiplicativity. Projection is -linear, retains the identity group element, and fixes every element of , which is contained in . It is therefore unital and surjective, including when .
Sources
Webb, A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory, §§11.3, 11.6 and 12.3–12.5, especially pp.240–245. Local argument and conventions as displayed above.
Depends on
Used by
- Relative Brauer homomorphism Definition
- Brauer images retain the surviving primitive idempotents Lemma
- Brauer kernel and relative trace support Lemma
- Every local full-defect block induces to a global block of defect D Lemma
- Normal p-subgroups fix block idempotents under Brauer projection Lemma
- Central idempotents under the Brauer homomorphism Proposition
- Maximal Brauer pairs exist and are conjugate Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Webb, A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory, §§11.3, 11.6 and 12.3–12.5, especially pp.240–245 (standard reference, not scraped)