Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-12
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Brauer kernel and relative trace support

Statement

For a p-subgroup P, ker⁡Br⁡P=∑Q<PTr⁡QP((kG)Q). If H≤G, a∈(kG)H, and Br⁡P(Tr⁡HG(a))≠0, then P is conjugate into H.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Finite G, characteristic-p field, and the subgroups and fixed elements stated.

[F1]

Brauer truncation retains the P-fixed group basis elements. (Brauer homomorphism for a p subgroup)

[F2]

The fixed-algebra projection is multiplicative. (Brauer homomorphism is multiplicative)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2F3

The conjugation-fixed space has a basis of orbit sums. A nontrivial orbit with representative x and stabilizer Q=CP(x)<P has sum Tr⁡QP(x) and maps to zero. Conversely for Q<P and a∈(kG)Q, the coefficient of z∈CG(P) in Tr⁡QP(a) is [P:Q]az=0. Hence the traces are in the kernel and span precisely the orbit sums removed by truncation. For P=1 the kernel and empty trace sum are both zero.

2.1F1F3∎

In Tr⁡HG(a), index the conjugates by G/H and group them into P-orbits. At z∈CG(P), all coefficients within one orbit agree, since conjugation by P fixes z. Every non-singleton orbit contributes zero. A surviving coefficient therefore requires a fixed coset gH, and PgH=gH means g−1Pg≤H. This proves the trace-support assertion.

Sources

Webb, A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory, §§11.3, 11.6 and 12.3–12.5, especially pp.240–245. Local argument and conventions as displayed above.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources