How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every smooth knot has a finite crossing-change sequence to the unknot
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. Every smooth oriented knot in admits a finite rational polygonal code recording a one-component diagram with only finitely many transverse double points and an overpassing choice at each, together with a finite sequence of changes that switch overpassing choices and whose final diagram represents the standard unknot.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC and a smooth oriented knot .
The Axiom of Countable Choice, written AC. The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
Under AC, every smooth oriented knot has an admissible finite rational planar code for a regular diagram. Every regular knot projection admits a finite rational planar code
The finite traversal algorithm outputs a list of crossing changes and changes at most one crossing per finite crossing record. Descending-diagram crossing-change sequence
If every first encounter at a crossing is an overpass, the represented diagram is ambient isotopic to the standard unknot. A descending based knot diagram represents the unknot
Proof
Given: The knot and AC.
Apply [F1] to choose an admissible finite code for a regular diagram of a representative of , and choose a basepoint in the interior of one edge away from every crossing and geometric bend. There is such a point: a one-component code has at least one nondegenerate polygonal edge segment, including in the crossing-free case, and only finitely many crossings and bends are forbidden. Choose an interior point of such a segment outside that finite set.
Apply [F2] to that finite code. The algorithm terminates after the finite crossing records are scanned and produces a finite crossing-change list; after those changes, each crossing is first encountered as an overpass.
By [F3], the code after the listed changes represents the standard unknot. Thus the chosen code and its finite crossing-change list witness the asserted existence for .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ozsváth, Stipsicz, and Szabó, Grid Homology for Knots and Links (standard reference, not scraped)
- Cole Charbonneau, Computing the Wirtinger Presentation of a Knot Group from a Knot Diagram (standard reference, not scraped)