How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Exactness is self-dual
Statement
A composable pair is exact at in an abelian category if and only if the opposite pair is exact at in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A composable pair in an abelian category .
The opposite of an abelian category is abelian (The opposite of an abelian category is abelian).
Exactness at means either or, equivalently, (Exactness at a node, Image and coimage in a category with kernels and cokernels).
Proof
By [L1], the opposite category is again abelian, so the definition [L2] applies there. Passing to the opposite exchanges kernels with cokernels and images with coimages.
Therefore the equality in is exactly the equality in . By [L2], those are the two exactness assertions.
Depends on
Used by
- Comember and the dual calculus Definition
- Two routes to every dual statement Remark
- Exactness of kernel and cokernel sequences under endpoint hypotheses Theorem
- The kernel row and cokernel row of a morphism of short exact sequences are exact at two nodes each Theorem
- The kernel-cokernel sequence of a composite Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Section 12.5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- David Mehrle, Category Theory, Part III, Chapter 7 (standard reference, not scraped)