Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Extension by zero for distributions with ambient closed support

Statement

Let F be closed in Rn, let FΩ with Ω open, and let uD(Ω) have support contained in F. Then there is a unique distribution u~ on Rn restricting to u on Ω and with support contained in F. No compactness of F is required. The assertion holds in ZF and uses ambient closedness, not merely relative closedness in Ω.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Compatible distributions on an arbitrary open cover glue uniquely (Distributions form a sheaf).

[F2]

A distribution vanishes on the complement of its support, and support is the complement of its largest vanishing open set (Support of a distribution).

Proof

Given: F,Ω,u as in the statement.

1.1

The sets Ω and RnF are open and cover Rn because FΩ. On their overlap ΩF, the distribution u vanishes by F2 since its support is contained in F. Hence u and the zero distribution on RnF are compatible.

givenF2
2.1

F1 glues them to u~. It restricts to u and is zero on RnF, so F2 gives support contained in F. Any other extension with this support must have the same two restrictions, and uniqueness in F1 makes it equal to u~.

step 1.1F1F2
3.1

If F is empty, F2 makes u=0 and the extension is zero; if Ω=Rn, the extension is u. Ambient closedness ensures that the second member of the cover is open. The proof therefore supplies no extension claim across a boundary when only relative closedness is known. There is no choice use beyond the choice-free sheaf theorem.

step 2.1F1F2

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources