Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Extension by zero for distributions with ambient closed support

Statement

Let F be closed in Rn, let F⊆Ω with Ω open, and let u∈D′(Ω) have support contained in F. Then there is a unique distribution u~ on Rn restricting to u on Ω and with support contained in F. No compactness of F is required. The assertion holds in ZF and uses ambient closedness, not merely relative closedness in Ω.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Compatible distributions on an arbitrary open cover glue uniquely (Distributions form a sheaf).

[F2]

A distribution vanishes on the complement of its support, and support is the complement of its largest vanishing open set (Support of a distribution).

Proof

Given: F,Ω,u as in the statement.

1.1givenF2

The sets Ω and Rn∖F are open and cover Rn because F⊆Ω. On their overlap Ω∖F, the distribution u vanishes by F2 since its support is contained in F. Hence u and the zero distribution on Rn∖F are compatible.

2.1step 1.1F1F2

F1 glues them to u~. It restricts to u and is zero on Rn∖F, so F2 gives support contained in F. Any other extension with this support must have the same two restrictions, and uniqueness in F1 makes it equal to u~.

3.1step 2.1F1F2

If F is empty, F2 makes u=0 and the extension is zero; if Ω=Rn, the extension is u. Ambient closedness ensures that the second member of the cover is open. The proof therefore supplies no extension claim across a boundary when only relative closedness is known. There is no choice use beyond the choice-free sheaf theorem. □

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources