How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Translation invariant test function operators are convolutions
Statement
A continuous complex-linear map , with the compact-open topology in the target, commutes with all translations if and only if it has the form for a unique distribution . Its values are smooth, and it is continuous into with uniform convergence of all derivatives on compact sets. Here . These assertions hold in ZF.
Facts & Assumptions
Convolution with a test is smooth, with derivatives on the test factor (Convolution with a test function is smooth).
Stagewise continuity of a linear map from into a locally convex space gives LF continuity (Test function lf topology universal property).
Smooth parameter test families pair smoothly with distributions (Distribution pairing with smooth parameter families).
Distributions satisfy a finite-order estimate on each fixed compact support (Local finite order characterization of distributions).
Proof
Given: a continuous linear as in the statement.
Suppose commutes with translations and put . Reflection maps to with unchanged derivative seminorms, so F2 makes it continuous on . Evaluation at zero is continuous on for the compact-open topology. Consequently is a continuous linear test functional, hence a distribution.
For fixed , reflection of the test is . Thus . F1 (or F3 for this parameter family) shows this is smooth. If another distribution gives the same operator, evaluating its convolution with at zero recovers its value on every , so it equals .
Conversely fix a distribution , a source support , a target compact , and target derivative order . All tests with , , and are supported in the single compact . F4 there gives , and F1 gives . This proves continuity from each stage into the smooth-function topology, hence continuity on by F2. Direct substitution gives , proving translation commutation. Empty source or target compact sets give zero seminorms; the zero distribution gives the zero operator. No closed-graph theorem or choice is used.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Razvan Gelca, Functional Analysis (standard reference, not scraped)