Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Local finite order characterization of distributions

Statement

A complex-linear functional u:D(Ω)C is a distribution if and only if, for every compact KΩ, there are an integer mK0 and a finite constant CK0 such that u(φ)CKpmK(φ)(φDK). The quantifiers are K(mK,CK); no simultaneous selection of witnesses is asserted or needed. The equivalence holds in ZF.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

A distribution is a continuous complex-linear functional on the LF test space (Distribution).

[F2]

The LF universal property tests continuity of linear maps on every fixed-support space, whose topology is the derivative-seminorm topology (Test function lf topology universal property).

Proof

Given: a complex-linear functional u.

1.1

Suppose u is continuous, and fix K. By F2 its restriction is continuous at zero. Thus there are m0 and ε>0 such that pm(ψ)<ε implies u(ψ)<1: take the largest order and the smallest positive radius in a finite basic neighborhood contained in the inverse image of the open unit disk. If that intersection has no constraints, the whole space maps into the disk; linearity then makes u zero on this stage, and m=0,ε=1 works.

givenF1F2
2.1

For pm(φ)>0, apply step 1.1 to εφ/(2pm(φ)) to get u(φ)(2/ε)pm(φ). If pm(φ)=0, every positive real multiple of φ satisfies the same strict neighborhood inequality, so tu(φ)<1 for every t>0, forcing u(φ)=0. This proves the estimate for the fixed K, and the argument applies to every K without selecting a family of pairs.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

Conversely suppose the stated estimates hold. Fix K and one witnessing pair. If CK=0, the restriction is zero. Otherwise, for any δ>0, the neighborhood pmK<δ/CK maps into z<δ. Hence every restriction is continuous; F2 implies u is continuous on D(Ω), and F1 makes it a distribution. For empty K the space is zero and CK=mK=0 suffice.

step 2.1givenF1F2

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources