How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Local finite order characterization of distributions
Statement
A complex-linear functional is a distribution if and only if, for every compact , there are an integer and a finite constant such that The quantifiers are ; no simultaneous selection of witnesses is asserted or needed. The equivalence holds in ZF.
Facts & Assumptions
A distribution is a continuous complex-linear functional on the LF test space (Distribution).
The LF universal property tests continuity of linear maps on every fixed-support space, whose topology is the derivative-seminorm topology (Test function lf topology universal property).
Proof
Given: a complex-linear functional .
Suppose is continuous, and fix . By F2 its restriction is continuous at zero. Thus there are and such that implies : take the largest order and the smallest positive radius in a finite basic neighborhood contained in the inverse image of the open unit disk. If that intersection has no constraints, the whole space maps into the disk; linearity then makes zero on this stage, and works.
For , apply step 1.1 to to get . If , every positive real multiple of satisfies the same strict neighborhood inequality, so for every , forcing . This proves the estimate for the fixed , and the argument applies to every without selecting a family of pairs.
Conversely suppose the stated estimates hold. Fix and one witnessing pair. If , the restriction is zero. Otherwise, for any , the neighborhood maps into . Hence every restriction is continuous; F2 implies is continuous on , and F1 makes it a distribution. For empty the space is zero and suffice.
Depends on
Used by
- Smooth functions are weakly dense in distributions Corollary
- Order of a distribution on a compact set Definition
- Derivatives of piecewise smooth functions include jump deltas Example
- Principal value distribution one over x Example
- Convolution of distributions is well defined under the support hypothesis Lemma
- Distribution pairing with smooth parameter families Lemma
- Compactly supported distributions have global finite order Theorem
- Distributions form a sheaf Theorem
- Local structure of distributions as derivatives of continuous functions Theorem
- Locally integrable functions embed in distributions Theorem
- Mollifier approximation in distributions Theorem
- Tensor product distributions and iterated pairings Theorem
- Translation invariant test function operators are convolutions Theorem
- Uniform finite order bounds for pointwise bounded distributions Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Semyon Dyatlov, Lecture notes for 18.155 (2022) (standard reference, not scraped)