How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Derivatives of piecewise smooth functions include jump deltas
Example
Assume Countable Choice. Let be locally finite, and let be on each component of . Assume finite one-sided limits at every , and assume that the classical derivative off , assigned arbitrary finite values on , belongs to . Then The sum is locally finite. These hypotheses hold, in particular, when is up to each side of every break point.
Facts & Assumptions
Locally integrable functions have regular functionals, and under Countable Choice the embedding theorem makes them distributions; distribution derivatives are signed test transposes and Dirac masses evaluate tests (Regular distribution from a locally integrable function, Locally integrable functions embed in distributions, Distributional derivative, Dirac delta and its derivatives).
Complex integration by parts on closed intervals holds under Countable Choice (Complex integration by parts on intervals and decaying lines).
Dominated convergence passes limits through integrable complex functions (Dominated convergence).
Compactwise finite-order bounds characterize distributions (Local finite order characterization of distributions).
Assume The Axiom of Countable Choice () for the Lebesgue integration interfaces.
Proof
Given: and the stated assumptions.
By F1, and are distributions. Fix a test and a closed interval containing its support in its interior, with endpoints outside . Local finiteness and compactness imply is finite: take a finite subcover of neighborhoods each meeting finitely many points. List these break points in increasing order. On each intervening open interval apply F2 to on for sufficiently small positive . This gives [given, F1, F2, F5]
Let decrease to zero, for example through the reciprocal integers once the truncated interval is nonempty. F3 applies to the two integrals, with majorants and , integrable on by the local integrability assumptions. The boundary values tend to and by the finite one-sided limits; at the test vanishes. Sum over the finitely many intervals. At each break point , the left interval contributes and the right contributes . The result is exactly the asserted formula when paired with .
On any fixed compact test support , the delta sum is finite and bounded in modulus by . It therefore defines a distribution by F4, so the test equality proves the distribution identity. If there are no break points in the sum is zero, and a zero jump contributes no delta. If is up to both sides, and are bounded on each of the finitely many compact pieces meeting a compact interval, hence locally integrable, verifying the stated sufficient case. Merely being on the open pieces does not supply local integrability of at the breaks.
Depends on
- Distributional derivative
- Dirac delta and its derivatives
- Regular distribution from a locally integrable function
- Locally integrable functions embed in distributions
- Complex integration by parts on intervals and decaying lines
- Dominated convergence
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Local finite order characterization of distributions
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
35 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Semyon Dyatlov, Lecture notes for 18.155 (2022) (standard reference, not scraped)