How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The finite centering matrix is the orthogonal projection onto the zero-sum subspace
Statement
For , let . Then , , , and for each , . Thus is the orthogonal projection onto .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integer and .
The finite centering matrix is , and it acts by subtracting the mean coordinate times (Finite centering matrices and centered data).
The standard inner product on is (The standard formulas on and on are inner products).
Proof
The matrix is symmetric, so the formula in [F1] gives . Also , and hence .
Writing , one has , so . The formula for in [F1] shows that its image is zero-sum; if , then . For any , the residual is orthogonal to every zero-sum vector by [F2]. Hence is the orthogonal projection of onto the zero-sum subspace.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Elements of Statistical Learning, second edition, corrected 12th printing (standard reference, not scraped)
- Maria Cameron, Linear and Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction, lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)