How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite geometric chains and compact manifold chain domination without choice
Statement
Let be a finite geometric simplicial complex with an ordered vertex set, and let be a local system of rank-one free right modules over an arbitrary unital ring . Its finite simplicial chain complex and intrinsic singular chain complex admit -linear chain maps with and an explicitly constructed chain homotopy . Choices of bases at its finitely many vertices make bounded finite-free.
Consequently, for every compact connected Hausdorff topological manifold , with boundary allowed, and every such local system supplied with a base-fiber identification with , its nonnegative singular chain complex is free with a formula-specified basis and is -linearly chain-homotopy dominated by a bounded finite-free complex. No choice principle, triangulation of , or assertion of finite CW type for is assumed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The ordered finite geometric complex and coefficient functor; for the consequence, the compact manifold and based coefficient system.
The least-subdivision small-chain construction supplies a chain map into chains subordinate to an open cover and a homotopy ; it preserves the image of each simplex. Applied to underlying abelian-group systems it respects any commuting right- action, since all coefficient transports are right-linear. Excision and Mayer–Vietoris with local coefficients
A compact Hausdorff manifold with boundary is a retract of a finite Euclidean cubical complex, without choice. Compact manifolds are retracts of finite polyhedra without choice
Proof
Here the right-module singular complex is defined intrinsically: , and on a coefficient its first face has coefficient over , while face has coefficient over . The signs include the first face sign . The identities pair and cancel faces for ; the only two potentially different transport composites are along edges and edge , equal because their paths are homotopic in the simplex. Thus for arbitrary noncommutative . The same formula on affine simplices defines , and affine inclusion defines a chain map . All formulas are right-linear. Choosing one basis in each of the finitely many vertex fibers makes each finite-free, and above the dimension of .
Cover by its finitely many open vertex stars. A simplex is called small if its image lies in one of them. Apply [F1] to obtain the small chain complex , inclusion , map and homotopy . The proof of [F1] transports coefficients only along paths within the domain simplex; hence its face cancellations and least-integer subdivision formula apply to the right-module complex of step 1.1, or equivalently to its underlying abelian-group complex. In particular and are right- linear and preserve every subcomplex generated by simplices whose images lie in a specified subcomplex of .
For a small singular simplex , let be the finite subcomplex generated by the geometric simplices whose relative interiors meet its image. If is a vertex whose open star contains that image, every such geometric simplex contains . Therefore is a cone with apex : joining to any of its faces remains in it. If is a face of , then . Choose as apex the least vertex whose open star contains the image. Both its simplicial chains and its singular chains have explicit augmented cone contractions: join to , using straight segments in the geometric cone, and transport coefficients along those segments. For a simplex map , the singular cone is , extended by at ; boundedness makes it continuous there. The boundary is the original chain minus the cone on its boundary, with the usual augmentation term in degree zero. The simplicial cone is the oriented join, zero when the vertex already occurs. These identities follow by the finite face cancellations. The coefficient system trivializes on the cone by its straight paths, so the identities apply to all its fibers without choosing trivializations independently at every point.
Define by induction. For a point simplex, send its coefficient to the least apex vertex of its carrier along their straight segment. For degree , the already defined is a cycle in ; in degree zero its transported augmentation is zero. Put equal to its simplicial cone at the chosen apex. The cone identity gives . Images of all faces lie in their nested carriers, so each operation stays in . Extend linearly on each coefficient fiber. This constructs the entire chain map by a formula on generators, with finite sums and least vertices, rather than an infinite set of individually chosen fillings.
Construct similarly. After lower degrees are defined, the chain is a cycle in , with zero augmentation in degree zero. Cone it singularly at the chosen apex and call the result . Its boundary is precisely that cycle, so . Put . Then Thus the displayed homotopy is actually right-linear and defined on all singular generators.
For an affine simplex of , image preservation in step 2.1 and the carriers of step 3.1 put in the simplicial chains of itself. On a vertex is the identity. Inducting on dimension, . For a positive-dimensional geometric -simplex, its top simplicial chain group is one fiber and its top boundary is injective: each codimension-one face occurs with coefficient the transported original coefficient, so zero boundary forces that coefficient zero. Hence . This proves , including degenerate singular simplices, which were never discarded from the source complex.
For the manifold consequence, take the actual retraction and from [F2]. Triangulate each grid cube by its coordinate-order simplices: for each permutation of the axes take the successive vertices from its lower vertex by adding those coordinate edges in that order. These finitely many simplices cover the cube, and on shared faces the same ordering of the remaining coordinates gives the same triangulation. Pull the coefficient system to along . With its finite simplicial complex, set and . The homotopy of step 5.1 gives , since literally. The coefficient maps have these same identities on fibers, so this is domination in right- chain complexes, not just ordinary homology.
Finally the singular modules on have actual formula-defined free bases. Take its finite convex ball/half-ball atlas. The finite intersection graph is connected; choose a finite spanning tree, one point for each tree-edge intersection, and coordinate-straight paths through these points joining the finitely many chart centers to the basepoint. For a point , use the first chart containing it and append that chart's straight path from its center to . This specifies a based path for every point without pointwise selection. Transport the supplied base vector along to obtain a basis of its fiber. Each singular generator then has its specified first-vertex basis. The differential and homotopies of the preceding steps respect those right-module structures. For disconnected finite complexes the first argument already works componentwise with finitely many vertex bases; empty complexes give zero maps. All manifold choices were finite atlas/tree data, and the only infinite constructions were recursive formulas on generators. This proves the full choice-free assertion.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Hatcher, Algebraic Topology (standard reference, not scraped)