Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Completed Hall wall crossing for finite acyclic quivers

Statement

Let Q be any finite acyclic quiver over Fq, including wild quivers, and let Z− and Z+ be any two assignments of upper-half-plane charges zi∈H. In the dimension completion of the subobject-first Hall algebra, Aall=∏ϕ∈ΦZ decreasingSZ(ϕ),ΦZ={ϕZ(e):0≠e∈NQ0}. The product is degreewise finite and includes all semistable objects, whether stable or strictly semistable. Applying either Euler integration I or skew integration J gives equal completed ordered products for Z− and Z+. Each integrated ordered product has constant term 1 and is a unit in its completed quantum torus; conjugation by the two equal products therefore gives the same continuous automorphism. No generic-stability, finite-type, 3-Calabi–Yau, orientation-data, or analytic convergence assumption is used.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite acyclic quiver over Fq and two collections of charges Z−,Z+ with each vertex charge in H.

[F1]

Aall and SZ(ϕ) are the degree-completed sums of all objects and of semistable objects at phase ϕ; the product is subobject-first (Subobject-first Hall completion and quantum tori for finite quivers).

[F2]

Every representation has a unique HN filtration with nonzero semistable factors of strictly decreasing phase (Quiver Harder–Narasimhan filtrations exist, are unique, and descend).

[F3]

Both I and J are continuous unital homomorphisms on the completed Hall algebra (Euler and skew integration are multiplicative for finite acyclic quivers).

Proof

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement.

1.1F1constructalgebra

Fix distinct phases ϕ1>⋯>ϕr. Iterating the defining formula (f⋆g)(M)=∑U⊆Mf(U)g(M/U) from [F1], with left-associated products, shows that the coefficient of δM in SZ(ϕ1)⋆⋯⋆SZ(ϕr) is the number of weak flags 0=M0⊆M1⊆⋯⊆Mr=M for which every nonzero factor Mj/Mj−1 is semistable of phase ϕj. The induction step chooses Mr−1⊆M in the last binary product and then uses the previous flag inside Mr−1; zero quotients exactly represent skipped phases.

1.2F1algebra

For a fixed dimension vector d, any contributing nonzero factor has dimension vector e with 0<e≤d. There are finitely many such vectors and therefore finitely many possible phases. A contributing flag has at most ∣d∣ nonzero factors. Thus the ordered product over all phases is a finite computation in each degree and defines an element of H^Q.

2.1F1F2step 1.1step 1.2

By [F2], for every M exactly one flag counted by the preceding flag-count argument has strictly decreasing semistable factors: its unique HN filtration. Therefore the coefficient of each δM in the ordered product is 1, which is the coefficient of δM in Aall. The zero object contributes the common degree-zero unit. This proves the Hall identity.

3.1F3step 2.1algebra

Apply I and J from [F3] to the degreewise truncations of the identity in step 2.1. Their continuity shows that the limits preserve the identity, giving both equalities of completed Euler and skew ordered products for Z− and Z+.

4.1F1F3step 1.2step 3.1algebra∎

Write each integrated phase factor as 1+gϕ, where every term of gϕ has positive total dimension. Then (1+gϕ)−1=1−gϕ+gϕ2−⋯, since for any fixed degree only finitely many powers contribute. By step 1.2 only finitely many phases affect a fixed degree, so the ordered product PZ and the reverse-ordered product of these inverses both converge degreewise. Their finite truncations are mutual inverses, and continuity of multiplication gives PZPZ−1=PZ−1PZ=1. Thus a↦PZaPZ−1 is a continuous automorphism with inverse a↦PZ−1aPZ. Step 3.1 gives the same PZ for Z− and Z+, so these conjugations agree. All limits are formal in the degree completion.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources