How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Completed Hall wall crossing for finite acyclic quivers
Statement
Let be any finite acyclic quiver over , including wild quivers, and let and be any two assignments of upper-half-plane charges . In the dimension completion of the subobject-first Hall algebra, The product is degreewise finite and includes all semistable objects, whether stable or strictly semistable. Applying either Euler integration or skew integration gives equal completed ordered products for and . Each integrated ordered product has constant term and is a unit in its completed quantum torus; conjugation by the two equal products therefore gives the same continuous automorphism. No generic-stability, finite-type, 3-Calabi–Yau, orientation-data, or analytic convergence assumption is used.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite acyclic quiver over and two collections of charges with each vertex charge in .
and are the degree-completed sums of all objects and of semistable objects at phase ; the product is subobject-first (Subobject-first Hall completion and quantum tori for finite quivers).
Every representation has a unique HN filtration with nonzero semistable factors of strictly decreasing phase (Quiver Harder–Narasimhan filtrations exist, are unique, and descend).
Both and are continuous unital homomorphisms on the completed Hall algebra (Euler and skew integration are multiplicative for finite acyclic quivers).
Proof
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement.
Fix distinct phases . Iterating the defining formula from [F1], with left-associated products, shows that the coefficient of in is the number of weak flags for which every nonzero factor is semistable of phase . The induction step chooses in the last binary product and then uses the previous flag inside ; zero quotients exactly represent skipped phases.
For a fixed dimension vector , any contributing nonzero factor has dimension vector with . There are finitely many such vectors and therefore finitely many possible phases. A contributing flag has at most nonzero factors. Thus the ordered product over all phases is a finite computation in each degree and defines an element of .
By [F2], for every exactly one flag counted by the preceding flag-count argument has strictly decreasing semistable factors: its unique HN filtration. Therefore the coefficient of each in the ordered product is , which is the coefficient of in . The zero object contributes the common degree-zero unit. This proves the Hall identity.
Apply and from [F3] to the degreewise truncations of the identity in step 2.1. Their continuity shows that the limits preserve the identity, giving both equalities of completed Euler and skew ordered products for and .
Write each integrated phase factor as , where every term of has positive total dimension. Then , since for any fixed degree only finitely many powers contribute. By step 1.2 only finitely many phases affect a fixed degree, so the ordered product and the reverse-ordered product of these inverses both converge degreewise. Their finite truncations are mutual inverses, and continuity of multiplication gives . Thus is a continuous automorphism with inverse . Step 3.1 gives the same for and , so these conjugations agree. All limits are formal in the degree completion.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Tom Bridgeland, Hall algebras and Donaldson–Thomas invariants, §§4.4–4.6 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Markus Reineke, The Harder–Narasimhan system in quantum groups and cohomology of quiver moduli, §§2 and 4 (standard reference, not scraped)