How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Cut-set outer bound for causal and full-feedback relay channels
Statement
For either causal model in Finite discrete memoryless relay channel and causal code, every achievable rate is in the closed convex hull of rate values satisfying, for some finite time-sharing variable and law , with the relay transition law used to evaluate the mutual informations. In particular, this is an outer bound; it need not be achievable for relay-only causality.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A length- causal relay code with uniform message , error probability , and the memoryless relay law of Finite discrete memoryless relay channel and causal code.
Finite discrete memoryless relay channel and causal code: at each time the output pair is drawn from ; current inputs are functions of the message and past outputs only.
Finite-alphabet Fano inequality: for every finite nonempty message set; for the conditional entropy is zero.
Finite conditional mutual information identities and equality: conditional mutual information is nonnegative.
Finite entropy and mutual-information chain rules: finite entropy and mutual information obey the chain rules used to expand the time-indexed terms.
Conditional mutual information is concave in the channel input law: for a fixed channel , averaging over an input time-sharing variable gives .
Proof
Fano's inequality gives . Apply the chain rule to write .
Since conditional mutual information is nonnegative, each summand is at most . Given , the current inputs are fixed by causality in either model, and [F1] makes the current output depend on those variables only through . Thus the summand equals . For the fixed channel , the past is a time-sharing variable independent of the current output once the current inputs are fixed. Applying [F5] gives .
For the second cut, . The relay input is determined by the past. Given the past and , the source input is determined; memorylessness therefore reduces each term to . Conditional on a fixed , the past is a time-sharing variable for the fixed channel . Applying [F5] and averaging over bounds the term by .
Let be uniform on and conditionally draw according to the time- joint law induced by the code and channel. Steps 2.1, 2.2 imply both cut inequalities with conditioning on . Dividing the Fano bound by , then taking a sequence of codes with , gives the stated outer bound after closure and convexification.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Thomas M. Cover and Abbas A. El Gamal, Capacity Theorems for the Relay Channel, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 25(5), 1979 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Abbas El Gamal and Young-Han Kim, Lecture Notes on Network Information Theory, arXiv:1001.3404v4 (standard reference, not scraped)