Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pending
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Capacity of a finite relay channel with output feedback to source and relay

Statement

For the finite relay channel with full output feedback to source and relay in Finite discrete memoryless relay channel and causal code, the capacity is C=max⁡PX,Xrmin⁡{I(X,Xr;Y), I(X;Y,Yr∣Xr)}.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite relay channel with full feedback to both encoders.

[F1]

Finite discrete memoryless relay channel and causal code: the source uses Xi=fi(M,Yi−1,Yri−1), while the relay uses Xr,i=gi(Yi−1,Yri−1) with no message argument; current outputs follow the memoryless law.

[F2]

Cut-set outer bound for causal and full-feedback relay channels: any causal relay code satisfies both cut-set bounds with a finite time-sharing variable.

[F3]

Decode-forward inner bound for a finite relay channel: block-Markov decode-forward achieves the minimum of the source-to-relay-observation and source-plus-relay-to-destination mutual informations.

[F4]

Finite distributions, entropy, divergence, and stochastic matrices: the finite entropy summand −pln⁡p, extended by zero at p=0, is continuous on the probability simplex.

[F5]

Conditional mutual information is concave in the channel input law: for a fixed channel, conditional mutual information is concave in the input law, including conditional input laws given Xr.

Proof

1.1F1F2F5algebra

Apply [F2]. Its outer bound has a finite time-sharing variable Q and bounds I(X,Xr;Y∣Q) and I(X;Y,Yr∣Xr,Q). Apply [F5] first with input (X,Xr) and no side information, then with input X and side information Xr. Averaging over Q cannot increase either conditional mutual information, so both are bounded by the corresponding quantities under the averaged joint input law PX,Xr. This gives the displayed maximum as an outer bound.

1.2F1F3given

For achievability, view (Yr,Y) as the relay's observation and Y as the destination output. This is a finite relay channel whose relay encoder can causally use the observation pair because it has full feedback in [F1]. Apply the block-Markov construction of [F3] with the relay observation Y~r=(Yr,Y); its decoding term becomes I(X;Y,Yr∣Xr), while the destination decoding term is I(X,Xr;Y). Every joint input law factors as PXrPX∣Xr, so the construction achieves every rate below the displayed minimum.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2F4algebra∎

The outer bound in step 1.1 and achievable rates in step 1.2 coincide for every joint input law. The joint-input probability simplex is compact. Each mutual information is continuous there because it is a finite sum of terms −pln⁡p, with pln⁡p extended continuously by 0 at p=0; the minimum of the two continuous functions is continuous. It therefore attains a maximum, and taking that maximum and closure proves the capacity formula.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources