How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The finite union bound
Statement
For every finite family of events , For both sides are .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite probability space and events .
Probability is monotone under inclusion (Normalization, nonnegativity, monotonicity, complements, and differences in a finite probability space).
Probability is additive on finite pairwise-disjoint families (Probability is additive on every finite pairwise-disjoint family of events).
Proof
For , put . Then the are pairwise disjoint, , and .
Hence .
For step 2.1 reads , and for it is equality.
Depends on
Used by
- A parameter ledger for the high-girth, high-chromatic alteration proof Example
- The random-colouring proof of R(k,k)>2^k/2 Example
- The union bound can be strict for overlapping events Example
- ℙ(α(G(n,p))≥ s)≤binom ns(1-p)^binom s2≤ nˢ exp(-p binom s2) for s≤ n Lemma
- For all positive k,ℓ, some finite graph has girth greater than ℓ and chromatic number greater than k Theorem
- For n≥1 independent random signs, ℙ(|S|≥ t)≤2 exp(-t²/(2n)) for t>0 Theorem
- If k≥1 and n≥3k² 2ᵏ, an n-vertex tournament with property Sₖ exists Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 29 results over 11 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Matousek and J. Vondrak, The Probabilistic Method, Lemma 1.1.3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- H. Pishro-Nik, Introduction to Probability, Statistics, and Random Processes, Section 6.2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)